Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, November 18, 2010

BREAKING NEWS: GOP PASSES EARMARK BAN

THE HOUSE GOP JUST PASSED THE EARMARK BAN!

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm sure it is filled with all kinds of loopholes that our elected officials are already aware of and will use to their benefit.

Anonymous said...

12:14 Why don't we read it before condemning it.

Anonymous said...

12:34 you must be on the wrong board because no one here reads anything besides a headline before they condemn it.

Anonymous said...

We don't need to read it! It's more smoke and mirrors! That's how Washington works!

Anonymous said...

I am not saying that I am in support of Earmarks, but I am certainly not against all of them. An earmark by Senator Mikulski just brought us here in Worcester County $950,000.00 closer to a dualized US 113... The same highway that killed 4 people a few weeks ago.

I agree that some earmarks are bad, but some are good too.

Anonymous said...

You do know that this will not reduce the deficit don't you? Earmarks are money that is already in the bill - its just a requirement of how it is to be spent - thus the term 'earmark'. Big to do about nothing.