Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, April 15, 2010

What Will Md General Assembly Ban Next?


Yet another example of liberal tyranny in action… are you kidding me??? This should just about do it for making Maryland the most business-unfriendly state in the country. Look at Mike Busch’s comments in the 3rd paragraph. Most people can drive while sipping a soda, or munching fries. Liberals seem to think you can idiot-proof all of life… it just takes a little more regulation. This makes me sick to my stomach! We daily edge closer to living life in this Marxist/Socialist state like Stalinst Russia. Oh, I wish the Eastern Shore had seceeded and formed our own state free of those cocksuckers in Annapolis!! CR

ANNAPOLIS — April 13, 2012 - Baltimore Sun

State legislators voted to close drive-throughs yesterday in a late-night, pizza-fueled frenzy in which they passed 20 other bills in the last minutes before the end of the session.

They said the ban, part of legislation outlawing eating while driving, will save lives. They also described it as one more victory in the war against distracted driving, which studies show is a major cause of accidents. Other distractions on the hit list: GPS systems, smoking, applying makeup, radios, Hooters billboards — and passengers, who may be required to be silent in coming years.

"We did not have the votes for a comprehensive ban on all distractions this year," said House Speaker Michael E. Busch. "But we're hopeful we'll push it through next year."Fast food chain restaurant owners were blindsided by the vote, they said. "How can you ban drive-throughs?" said Mike Schmidt, who owns a McDonald's in Annapolis. "They are the quintessential American dining experience."

Another said there was no way to enforce it, since people could buy food to go and still eat in their cars. "Are they going to station cops outside our driveways, like bars?" asked Michelle Smith, who owns a Taco Bell in Dundalk.

Legislators could not say whether the ban would stop people from eating in their cars, pointing out that after hand-held cell phones and texting were banned in New Jersey, the number of people who admitted to texting while driving rose, according to a study by Fairleigh Dickinson University of New Jersey drivers.Maryland has not analyzed whether its ban on using hand-held devices two years ago has reduced accidents. But Maryland reports $2 million higher revenue this year from tickets related to it.

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller said it didn't matter whether the bill worked. "We needed to do something. We can tinker with it later." He said banning drive-throughs was the logical next step after banning texting and talking on hand-held cell phones while driving in 2010 and then extending the ban last year to any use of a cell phone while driving.

The fiscal analysis attached to the bill said it would generate $15 million in fines for the next budget year,(this is what it's all about for the Libs - control of every aspect of ones life and money......CR note) a tiny drop in the state's $2 billion structural deficit. Since no other state has banned drive-throughs, Department of Legislative Services analysts said the figure was only a "guesstimate," however.

One mother questioned how legislators could enforce this law or a stricter one next year.

"My son doesn't listen to legislators," said Baltimore City resident Marie Campbell, mother to Thomas, 18 months. "He doesn't even listen to me," she said. The harried mom says the only time she has to eat most mornings is in the car and questioned how legislators intend to force toddlers to be quiet if they pursue a stronger bill next year.

Others wondered whether police would be distracted from catching speeders and other dangerous drivers in their quest to root out motoring masticators.

And one convenience store owner worried if his chips and other snacks would be next on legislators' hit list. "When legislators doubled the cigarette tax, I lost a quarter of my business," said Greg Ali, who owns a Royal Farms in Rockville. "If they ban snack food, I'm a goner."

He said he was scouting new locations to open his business in Virginia, where "legislators are less schizophrenic."

Anti- obesity groups praised the bill for one of its unintended consequences. "From now on, hungry motorists will have to eat their fast food the slow food way, sitting in a chair at a table, or face a ticket," said Tracy Delgado, an obesity researcher at Johns Hopkins University. She said the drive-through ban was a good first step to forcing people to eat healthier and hoped it would prompt legislators to consider banning all processed food.

David Kessler, former Food and Drug Administration commissioner and author of "The End of Overeating," praised Maryland as a "model for other states to follow to help people help themselves."

Legislators are exempted from the ban on eating in their cars if they are on en route to Annapolis during the session or on legislative business, according to the law.

Marta H. Mossburg is a senior fellow at the Maryland Public Policy Institute and a fellow at the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity. Her column appears regularly in The Baltimore Sun. Her e-mail is martamossburg@gmail.com.

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Seems to me there are alot more important issues to ban in this state beside food...oh my god..do they have nothing better to do with their time..if not then why are we paying them the big bucks...this is so funny and ridiculous...!!!

Anonymous said...

What does this mean? No more drive-in's at all? Or jsut at night? I'm officially not a Democrat anymore, this is beyond stupid. It's sick...Why don't we just go back to a dictator government.

Anonymous said...

this has got to be a late april fools joke.
although with the liberal loonies in charge anything is possible

Rebel Without a Clue said...

"Legislators are exempted from the ban on eating in their cars if they are on en route to Annapolis during the session or on legislative business, according to the law." -- Now doesn't that sound familiar? Let me see . . .., Oh I remember now! Congressional Health Care, it has a similiar tone to it. Another example of "do as I say not as I do" for the common folk. They might extend that reach to police officers to so that they can stay busy catching "eaters" while eating in their cruisers. We wouldn't want the state to lose out on any revenue now would we?

Anonymous said...

Joe, by your first paragraph it seems as though you don't realize that this is satire.

Anonymous said...

That is ridiculious!!! I love drive-thru's although I don't visit them much. But since I am disabled due to MS and have a great deal trouble walking drive-thru's are really the only way to curb my time-to-time hankering for a double cheese burger or a cup a coffee from Dunkin Donuts. If this crap goes through I think it will be time for me to finally relocate to a less liberal state. Maryland is getting insane.

Anonymous said...

Seriously? That is just stupid, plain and simple stupid! On the rare occasion that I eat on the run, I can handle watching the road while chewing! Instead of restricting everyone, most of which are perfectly capable of chewing gum while walking, how about holding the morons more accountable and charge them with "stupid while driving"

Common sense tells a person driving is more important than searching for a piece of lettuce that has fallen on the floor board. Common sense says if you are going to drink while driving, non alcoholic drinks of course, do not take a cup that is so big it will obstruct your view while sipping from it!

Good God stupid is ruining this country! The better solution is to stop regulating the kids so they can gain some common sense as adolescents and will use it when they become of age.

Maryland makes me ill.

Anonymous said...

Looks more like satire than fact.

Anonymous said...

LOLOLOL...just the laugh I needed this morning!

Anonymous said...

I think this is great,to many distracted drivers.
Will also help with the obesity problem.

tedh said...

"Maryland has not analyzed whether its ban on using hand-held devices two years ago has reduced accidents. But Maryland reports $2 million higher revenue this year from tickets related to it."

Truth be told!

Anonymous said...

I recently saw a vehicle drifting all over the road in front of me and thought 'he must be drunk'.. but as I came up beside him, I saw what the deal was-- he was reading a newspaper!
So, I guess they need to ban newspapers (not such a bad idea), rather than revoking the drivers licenses of absolute idiots.

park-n-ride-al said...

My comments are directed at all members of Government whether by election or hire.

The purpose of the public sector is to provide a service to the private sector. The private sector pays taxes in order to fund public services. When any part of the Government ceases to provide the private sector any services, it should be eliminated. During poor economic times, the private sector's ability to fund services from the public sector is reduced. When the public sector funds fall short fall short of providing some services, those services and the public sector personnel associated with them should be eliminated. If this is not followed, you end up with what's referred to as a "structural deficit".

Somehow, our Governments have come to believe that the private sector owes them jobs which they view as defining the allowable behavior of the general population. Does anyone remember the individual working in the unemployment office complaining about being overworked? The public sector needs to stop complaining and start providing service or there will come a day whereby there is no private sector to fund them.

Anonymous said...

C'mon folks...READ ... look at the date in the headline... April 13, 2012. Last time I looked it was 2010. The author's point is... what is next after they ban cell phone use ??

suthrnthunder said...

what about the people (including the police officers) that are there laptops i gues
s that is ok

Anonymous said...

Look at the date of the article!!!!!

Anonymous said...

they aint worried about safety. the REAL reason is listed 1st sentence of the 7th paragraph..."15 million in revenue..."

Rebel Without a Clue said...

Good point about the date! I overlooked that one. But satire is generally based on truth and this seems to be "speculative" satire so whomever came up with it may have great insight over things to come. I for one would not be surprised if something like this was actually coming into existence given the state of our so-called lawmakers.

Anonymous said...

Marie Campbell needs to slow herself down and give her child the proper environment for breakfast.

Meals should be the most relaxing part of the day, not giving your baby a greasy hashbrown in the car.

This Country's prioritie's are so messed up.

Brian Dayton said...

Just another prime example of what kind of idiots are in control right now. And frankly, calling them idiots is being way too nice.

Chimera said...

They (the anointed ones who make stupid nanny state laws)already effectively crowded out the smokers,anyone who eats junk food is next.Notice they dont pick on boozers,who kill more people driving than overeating does

Anonymous said...

Please note the date on the satire/article by Marta.

Anonymous said...

How about a law that prohibits procreation and/or voting while either liberal, or having an IQ below 120.