Face it - they dont know that a receipt exists because they haven't gotten around to reconciling that account yet. Check back in a year or so, and they might have filed it by then.
You might be able to ask the county, who would likely have issued the receipt for $1.
Point is, someone is playing games and doesn't want to fess up. I think they are refusing to comply with PIA requests. What else will they hide? It got my attention. I guess Barrie told him not to comply with Joe's requests. After all, she thinks she's a big dog, but the pound is getting ready to euthanize her a$$.
Gee Tomcat...it wouldn't have costed nearly as much if the mayor didn't instruct the incredible waste of money attorney to write the response....which was inaccurate anyway.
So if it's anything like my attorney...it probably costed $150.00 to write the letter. The mayor should pay the citizens back for that. Incidentally the result of an inaccurate letter written by the city atty and published as true which actually publicly proves that the work of said attorney isnt worth the paper on which it's written is.....well.....PRICELESS!
Somebody, please tell Wilber to hit the road--HE's the one costing the taxpayers lots of $$$$$$. As we've seen, when put to the test (like by the Circuit Court) Wilber's opinions are worth zilch and don't hold up. He needs to give this game up.
Wilber would have to write the letter either way, if there was a recepit with it or not. So the whole letter with time researching probably cost the City $300.
I think the public should have to pay all the actual staff costs for PIA requests.
No it's not the same. If Terry Cohen hadn't asked what the water departments surplus was? Who knows where that $5.6 million may have went and the question also squashed a 10% hike saving every water customer in this city.
If you want to be led around like a blindman go ahead, thinkers ask questions.
16 comments:
DoH~!!
oubepjtPaul Wilbur must be fired . Mark Tilghman would be a perfect attorney for the city.
Face it - they dont know that a receipt exists because they haven't gotten around to reconciling that account yet. Check back in a year or so, and they might have filed it by then.
You might be able to ask the county, who would likely have issued the receipt for $1.
The letter is the receipt. So was Wilber playing semantic games?
Oh, sorry, Mr. Albero, you asked for a RECEIPT. The dollar received was acknowledged in a LETTER. You didn't ask for the LETTER.
Gimme a break.
How much did Joe's request for a $1 receipt cost the tax payers???
Point is, someone is playing games and doesn't want to fess up. I think they are refusing to comply with PIA requests. What else will they hide? It got my attention. I guess Barrie told him not to comply with Joe's requests. After all, she thinks she's a big dog, but the pound is getting ready to euthanize her a$$.
Gee Tomcat...it wouldn't have costed nearly as much if the mayor didn't instruct the incredible waste of money attorney to write the response....which was inaccurate anyway.
So if it's anything like my attorney...it probably costed $150.00 to write the letter. The mayor should pay the citizens back for that. Incidentally the result of an inaccurate letter written by the city atty and published as true which actually publicly proves that the work of said attorney isnt worth the paper on which it's written is.....well.....PRICELESS!
What an as*hole.
Somebody, please tell Wilber to hit the road--HE's the one costing the taxpayers lots of $$$$$$. As we've seen, when put to the test (like by the Circuit Court) Wilber's opinions are worth zilch and don't hold up.
He needs to give this game up.
It says on the county document Ted Shea that issued the reciept.
Wilber would have to write the letter either way, if there was a recepit with it or not. So the whole letter with time researching probably cost the City $300.
I think the public should have to pay all the actual staff costs for PIA requests.
That's a good one one, money is the price for the freedom to question.....
Yes Tim, why else should the tax payers pay for someones questions.
Like Joe is saying in the fire boat scenario today, why should the tax payers pay to protect the few.
It's the same EXACT thing.
And the point of all of this was what?
Anonymous you must be either;
a)very close to Barrie and company
b)anti albero
c)brain dead
The post clearly shows the attorney employed by the city of Salisbury, blatantly LIED.
This evidence should be sent to the bar association, let him suffer the consequences for his actions.
Wilber proves the addage lawyer is synonymous with liar.
He is paid with tax dollars and should be fired by the tax payers at the next city council meeting. I'll bet that will get his attention.
Sorry it's took me so long to respond the above multiple choice questions.
The answer isn't A, B, or C.
It's D. (I know, that wasn't a choice but take my word on it) ALL OF THE ABOVE. MUAHAHAHAHAHA
No it's not the same. If Terry Cohen hadn't asked what the water departments surplus was? Who knows where that $5.6 million may have went and the question also squashed a 10% hike saving every water customer in this city.
If you want to be led around like a blindman go ahead, thinkers ask questions.
Post a Comment