Intertwined...

By Thornton Crowe

Update: Another video for you to review.

All is not as it seems... but now it's unwinding faster than you can say corruption!

FBI Director James Comey has been in the spotlight since his nonsensical call for no criminal charges to be filed against Democrat presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton on July 5th. With the last dump of information done on the Friday before Labor Day weekend, public scrutiny has been more present and caused Congress to, once again, call him to testify in front of them as early as next week.

In an inter-office memorandum last week, Comey weakly doubled down on his refusal to recommend charges as well as defended his information dump on the Friday before a long weekend - a method used by government in the hopes it will outrun the news cycle and people won't pay attention or forget about it by the following Tuesday.

However, many of his contemporaries and fellow department agents are less than impressed. There's many indications the FBI is currently engaged in a bitter battle between agents who know the truth verses Comey's desperate cover-up for Hillary Clinton and her multiple crimes.  Furthermore, his provocative stance has validated many Americans whom have long suspected that there are two legal systems - one for the connected and one for everyone else.

NYT Ashley Parker Lies about Trump Presser

By Thornton Crowe

While it may be no surprise that once again, Donald Trump has broken more barriers and taboos by having a press conference in a time where precedent dictates the opposing party's time to keep quite, the New York Times writer, Ashley Parker has blatantly misquoted and misrepresented his words in her article.

Her headline, Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails, suggests that he was doing this; however, anyone who watches the presser can easily tell, he was being sarcastic - far from a serious plea for Russians' aid. Parker has given a new name to journalistic larceny and should issue an apology to both Trump and the voters for her grossly misleading -- big lie!

In a time where MSM is in great scrutiny due to the Wikileaks expose, Parker's misstep is one that grossly exposes the NYT's aim to continue misinforming voters. Hence, betraying their own biased towards Clinton in this election. It's no shocker that the Times would promote a liberal candidate - especially Clinton, but this goes beyond any semblance or guise of journalist integrity. It's just downright DISHONEST on their editorial staff and Parker's part.

As the Wikileaks continue to come out, the more we see, the more angry the voting public becomes because, let's face it, we've been had -- and its not just with this election but for decades. The media's love affair with the Democrat party has been a long one, but its been detrimental to Americans trying to parse through the issues to make their decisions about whom to cast a vote. It has been dastardly on the part of the Media Puppets to shameless run a propaganda arm and it evades all proof or truth.

Whatever happened to journalistic integrity? When did it become acceptable, this theater journalism? Why do Americans tolerate being lied to with such regularity?

Insanity needs to stop. People, Wake Up! The future of America hangs in the balance. Time for this stupidity has come to an end. Trust but VERIFY!

And to Ms. Parker, don't twist words around to suit your agenda. It makes you irrelevant and brands you untrustworthy to report for even the New York Times! Shameless. 

Below is Donald Trump's Press Conference - 7/27/2016

Watch the presser for yourself, then read Ashley Parker's article. Be your own judge!

video from Right Side Broadcasting.

Political Fodder or Dangerous Reality?

By Thornton Crowe

Why does some think it's such a big deal? It's only about email... Right?

The Republicans are just in a witch hunt, it's really not that big of a deal!

One thing that has been particularly disturbing about the public shrug off towards Hillary Clinton's email scandal is this:

Does the general public really understand just what it all meant?

With Democrats running subversive tactics to shield the ugly truth while trying to make Republicans look like they're on some Agatha Christie Witch Hunt, it's no wonder many Americans allotting a whole hour for news a day, will not fully grasp the deal behind the deal of this scandal. It's easy to fall prey to Megyn Kelly telling you 'it's only politics', but it goes so much deeper than mere politics. It actually goes as deep as Clinton Cash, where the onion layers are so many, it's hard to peel in 20 minutes or less.

We can all sit around and hypothesize whether or not Clinton possessed a criminal intent, but it still doesn't erase the cold-hard facts. By placing top secret emails on an unsecured, undocumented private home-brew server, she is telling Americans she's dangerous, bent on selling out America. Her own lies about said SERVERS and DEVICES (plural and emphasized) are indicative of what we call, Guilty Knowledge. Meaning, she knew what she did was illegal and tried to conceal it from Congress, but more importantly, you, the American voters.

With this article, I task you to investigate the reality behind the hyperbole and decide for yourself if this is really what you would deem presidential behavior.

If you take the time to really process what this says, you'll quickly see this has nothing to do with political parties or some big, mystical Right Wing Conspiracy. There's some real concerns - no, evidence indicating we should be worried for our safety.

It's four easy points, you can't afford to ignore.

Disturbing Precedent...

By Thornton Crowe

Yes, it's taken me a full day to recover from my shock and dismay about James Comey's the nonsensical statements yesterday that's sent the country into yet another tizzy. I have to admit, not knowing him on any personal level, many of his friends and colleagues are people I've long held in high esteem. He has been described as a true advocate of the Law. A hard-nosed, no nonsense guy who brings criminal to bear for their criminality.

Therefore, as you can imagine, I was more than shocked after his set-up for recommendations that turned bad when he stated no charges would be filed against Hillary Clinton for her grossly negligent handling of our State secrets.

Was it really a good day for Hillary Clinton?

When one really examines his verb, he damned Clinton; showing her as incompetent, unreliable and unethical as well as extremely careless (which is legal synonymous with gross negligence -- written verbatim in the laws she broke!) For those purposes, he eviscerated her character and proved her unfit for the office as President of the United States. Let's face it, now, if she were to apply for a file clerk job at the DOJ, she couldn't gain security clearance because of what he read from his report. How can a person be a president without being able to have security clearance?