Last Thursday the Wicomico County Board of Education (WCBOE) met in closed session. This, by itself, isn’t particularly unusual. What was unusual - downright worrisome - was the subject matter.
The Wicomico County Board of Education met in closed session to obtain legal advice. What advice did they seek? Sources on Long Avenue confirm that the board wanted to know if they were obligated to answer questions posed by the Wicomico County Council; how far they have to go in answering questions from the council; and even if they are required to MEET with the county council. This really jibes well with the claims of Supt. John Fredericksen and multiple board members that they are an "open book" and welcome public scrutiny.
How can the members of the BOE be shocked that the public questions their their integrity, and their stewardship of the taxpayers’ dollars, when they behave in such an underhanded fashion?
WAS THIS “SECRET SESSION” EVEN LEGAL?
The board may have a closed session in order to seek advice from legal counsel, discuss litigation, discuss a personnel matter, etc. I am quite sure that this meets the technical letter of the Maryland Open Meetings Act. They were seeking advice from legal counsel.
This is precisely why this meeting violated the spirit, if not the letter, of the act. The were seeking legal advice on how to stonewall the elected representatives of the taxpaying citizens of Wicomico County.
TRUST ME?
Just a couple of weeks ago, WCBOE members had a hissy fit in front of the county council. They argued that they were tired of being “grilled” and having to answer insulting questions from the council.
A few days later, the Daily Times implied that the Wicomico County Council were equivalent to terrorists for daring to ask valid questions regarding the WCBOE’s stewardship of taxpayers’ dollars. In their scathing, falsely premised, op-ed the DT made the following statement:
While the council does not have authority to manage the school board's budget line by line, it does control the purse strings and may choose to cut funding. However, council members are not better qualified nor do they understand the responsibilities or inner workings of the Board of Education -- which includes 14,619 students, 1,249 teachers and 25 schools -- while meeting local, state and federal regulations.
Pointing fingers and thereby tacitly implying there must be wrongdoing, mishandling or waste somewhere does not lead to constructive resolutions. Divisive behavior does not save money, nor does it lead to a better education for our county's students.
There is only one goal: to make the best possible use of scarce resources to provide the highest quality education for all students. The only way to reach this goal is through open, honest dialogue and constructive debate.
Yet, it is the heroes of our local paper – the Wicomico County Board of Education – who have made fools of the very champions who rode to their defense. One can argue that the Wicomico County Council, who meets in public, answers questions from all comers, and continually strives to be good and faithful stewards of the taxpayers’ hard earned dollars are, in fact, more qualified to make decisions regarding our children’s educations. They certainly set a better example.
Divisive behavior may not save money. Nor does attempting to hide relevant information from the public and its elected representatives. We agree that “open, honest dialogue and constructive debate” are helpful, if not necessary, to setting public policy. We would also argue that conspiring to hide information and obfuscate our elected representatives does not meet ANY definition of these terms.
The next time that a member of the WCBOE or Supt. John Fredericksen dare stand up in public and proclaim that they are forthright individuals with only the best interests of the county’s children in mind, any person present should remember that this same sanctimonious group wasted tax dollars attempting to shield themselves from public scrutiny.
Stonewalling and Sophistry
This recent behavior of the WCBOE would be shameful enough if it were an isolated incident. Talk to parents who have dared question the board’s policies or decisions. Even a relatively small sample yields multiple examples of the same stonewalling. If not stonewalled, the questioning party is treated to sophistry straight from the dialogues of Plato.
The answer to these problems is simple. Fredericksen and the WCBOE need only be honest. If they don’t know the answer to a question, admit it. If they aren’t comfortable releasing certain information, say so and tell us why. Otherwise, simply answer the question. You don’t need a lawyer to do that.