SALISBURY – Plans to release news that the Salisbury City Council would complete the budget process and pass the Fiscal Year 2012 budget next week were changed yesterday after the council learned from the city administration that the budget’s public hearing, held May 9, had not been advertised as required by law.
“Council acted quickly to hold an emergency special meeting this morning to approve, on first reading, the budget ordinance based on the mayor’s submitted budget and budget message and to set a new public hearing date, time and place, which will be 6:05 p.m. on Monday, June 6, 2011, in Room 301 of the Government Office Building, 125 N. Division St., Salisbury, MD,” Council President Terry Cohen said.
“The advertisement for the budget public hearing is scheduled to run in this Sunday’s
The emergency special meeting was officially announced this morning, then held at 9:45 a.m. The final council budget work session will be Tuesday, May 31, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. in Room 306 of the Government Office Building, with the public hearing scheduled for June 6 as noted. Cohen said that addressing the 18.6% sewer rate hike would likely be the biggest item of the council’s general discussion on Tuesday, especially with the number of concerned citizens contacting the council. The public hearing on June 6 would be the public’s last opportunity to comment on the mayor’s proposed budget.
The council could possibly adopt the budget on second reading after the public hearing, but June 8 is being held as a fall-back date for adoption. The budget must be finalized no later than June 15, as mandated by the city charter, including any possibility of a mayoral veto and a possible council override.
“The public has already given council feedback on the mayor’s proposed budget, which has gotten due consideration in deliberations, so if we don’t hear something really different and necessary, we may pass the budget that same night,” Cohen noted.
“We know the public will be understanding of the time constraints we now face due to this administrative error,” Cohen added. “Many have expressed appreciation for the diligence the council has exercised and members’ accessibility to the public. Council has been cooperative and forthcoming with ideas, trying to act in the best interest of our citizens.”
Daily Times. These actions should cure any potential legal defect with the process, ensure full transparency to the public, and enable the budget process to be completed in accordance with the city charter,” Cohen explained.







Back in 2009, the city of Pittsburgh paid $250,000 for 250 elegant iron trash cans weighing more than 200 pounds each. Critics of the mayor called it a waste of city funds at the time, but they are very nice-looking. Now 20% of them are missing, and it took police and the public works department four months to figure out where they've gone. They were hauled off and sold for scrap. 