Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, July 01, 2019

The Supreme Court Endorse Judicial Harassment of President Trump

Through the years, we have been vigilant defenders of integrity in our elections and that has included exposing efforts to dilute the will of U.S. citizens at the polls. So of course, we are disappointed in the Supreme Court’s ruling that delays, perhaps permanently, the Trump administration’s plan to include a question on the 2020 census inquiring about a respondent’s citizenship status.

It is unfortunate that the Supreme Court has endorsed the continued judicial harassment of the Trump administration. It ought to be an obvious point that the U.S. Census should try to figure out how many Americans and non-Americans are present in the United States.

We strongly encourage the Trump administration to try to move this issue through the courts in time for the 2020 census.

In mid-February, we joined with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in filing an amici curiae brief in the United States Supreme Court, urging it to overturn the ruling of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York blocking the Secretary of Commerce from adding a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. The brief argues that including a citizenship question would help us and the government make sure only eligible citizens are on the voting rolls:

But leftists hate the idea of the American people knowing more about the number of foreign nationals present in the United States, which is why they oppose a census question about citizenship. You can be sure that Judicial Watch will continue to monitor, and participate, when appropriate, in next round of court fights on this key question about the future of our nation.

More updates from JW here

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

9th circuit TRAITORS. Dox em.

Anonymous said...

The answers to citizenship questions in the Census are important to historical research and history itself.

Not having them and their permanent record makes Revisionist history so much easier to write, which works so very well for the Leftists.

Anonymous said...

Case goes your way: "Aint America the greatest"

Case doesn't go your way: "the entire judicial system is evil and out to get us".

Anonymous said...

@ July 1, 2019 at 10:36 AM

Lol. So true.

Notice how this is still some "liberal" kabaal and conspiracy against the dear leader.

Notice how they still RAIL on the 9th Court... but leave out that this Supreme Court Decision was almost completely unanimous (even Trumps picks Kavanaugh and Gorsuch ruling so)... but some how this is STILL the Courts picking on Trump's administration.

Being made to follow the law is not being picked on or harassed. Get over it.

Anonymous said...

Just creating more moving targets and I can hardly wait for the sthtf

Anonymous said...

I think some of you are assuming non-citizen means illegal immigrant. The opposition to the citizenship question is rooted in the belief that many non-citizens will not fill out the census if they need to declare their citizenship status. It's a no brainer for republicans because you can pull funding from areas with non citizens AND continue to exacerbate many of the problems minorities deal with already.

Anonymous said...

You are an ''Insane'' one ! You must be one of ((them))

Anonymous said...

Kabaal? Or cabal? Or cannibal?

Anonymous said...

I see you Jim Jones! How's the cult coming along, "Sweet One?"

Anonymous said...

Their not looking out for you.

Anonymous said...

What's wrong with knowing if you are a citizen. Citizens should be the only people voting in an American election. This is not evil. Voting as a non U.S. citizen is evil.

Anonymous said...

If you are a American citizen then you won't have a problem stating so. In fact you should be proud as an AMERICAN to answer that question.