Sorry, folks, with the State’s Attorney Forum and the Wicomico Humane Society story taking up a lot of my time the last couple of days, I didn’t get a chance to write and post about City Council President Louise Smith’s ridiculous – I mean RIDICULOUS – letter to the editor in Wednesday’s Daily Times. This is all about the anti-crime legislation package Mayor Jim Ireton introduced on August 2.
If you haven’t been following the story here, I’ve included links in this post to catch you up, and I suggest you do because this story is only going to get bigger and Salisbury News will continue to be the leader on it! This will seem like a long post because this new format has a narrow column, but stay with me here, it’ll be worth it.
Louise Smith writes this letter to the newspaper editor, headlined “Let’s work together to reduce city’s crime.”
Really, Louise? The real crime is Louise Smith thinks if she says “Let’s work together” enough times, you’ll think she means it. Not a chance, Louise, not while Salisbury News is around. You aren’t going to fool people any more.
Honest to God, folks, this letter is hilarious! Her third line into it, Louise says, “Closed door meetings were held for 14 months between the mayor, Councilwomen Debbie Campbell and Terry Cohen, two attorneys and a few staff members.”
Really, Louise? Now, forget whether this statement is true or not for a moment, folks. The fact is, at the last council meeting August 23, Terry Cohen said that there were complaints to this effect and Louise said she never said that.
Well, just recently Salisbury News posted
GO HERE that Louise DID INDEED complain about it before. So, folks, with Louise Smith having JUST RECENTLY DENIED that she said that, even though a Salisbury News reader revealed that she did, Louise now writes a letter to the Daily Times in which she says EXACTLY that!!!
In this one quote, Louise Smith blew ALL her credibility -- IF she had ANY left. Not only does she complain about what she says she hasn’t complained about before but has indeed complained about before, she’s whining that all this lacks transparency.
Really, Louise? Transparency? You mean the transparency like this
GO HERE in which you REFUSE the third vote that would allow the public input meeting on the crime legislation package Debbie Campbell and Terry Cohen are holding (that you won’t attend) to be televised on PAC14 (after you had secret meetings behind the PAC14 board’s back and got them a new board plus more money at the expense of the furloughed POLICE!)? That transparency, Louise?
Or the transparency where you tried to shut down discussion at the last meeting about putting the mayor’s legislation package on a work session? That transparency, Louise?
In her letter, Louise says she wants a task force to study the issue and answer a lot of questions. Well, Louise, I can tell you that there are TWO task forces, right now – the Mayor’s Crime Task Force and the Safe Streets Coalition – that have been going on for a couple of years and that I have probably been to more of these meetings than you have!!!
Are you saying that out of a crowd of people like Sheriff Mike Lewis, State’s Attorney Davis Ruark, MSP Salisbury Barracks Commander Ernie Leatherbury, even your council ally Shanie Shields, you couldn’t find ANYBODY with whom to “Let’s work together”??? Maybe, just MAYBE, Louise, if you had gone to some of these meetings, you might have the answers to all those SAPOA questions you asked.
Or you might get the answers if you just put this anti-crime legislation package on a work session, which your own Council Rules of Order or whatever they are say you SHALL do!!! “Rules? Rules? We don’t need no stinkin’ rules,” as my friend G.A. Harrison would say, huh, Louise?
If you people want to catch up on this circus (and I mean no disrespect to Jim Ireton or the elephant he was riding this week), click on the links I’ve supplied so far, plus these
GO HERE,
GO HERE,
GO HERE and
GO HERE, read these posts and click on the links to the videos.
Then get yourselves to the public input meeting on this anti-crime package, details if you
GO HERE, on Sept. 15 (no excuses!) and let the absent Louise know how you feel about all this whining and anything but “Let’s work together” she’s doing. Thanks to Salisbury News exposing all this, plenty of people are volunteering to record the meeting so Louise can watch or listen later.
And just to be clear, folks, I’m not saying I’m all for or all against any of this legislation. As a matter of fact, I’d like to hear what the public has to say about it, too. Jim Ireton may want it all voted on, up or down, but let’s face facts, that’s just not realistic.
What I AM saying is, it’s WAY past time for Louise Smith to STOP WHINING and playing a victim like Barrie Tilghman. QUIT WHINING, Louise, and JUST DO YOUR JOB!
Yes, Louise Smith,
YOU’VE BEEN BLOGGED – AGAIN!!