DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Monday, September 17, 2018
Breaking News: The Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and the woman who accused him of sexual assault will be called to testify in the Senate on Monday.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Should be New Law to Protect ALL in America !!!!
Should be 7 year Limit (staute of Limitations)
If they don't file complaint in that time >>> Tough
Put up THEN >>> or Shut UP
Noone will be safe in this country if this Bullshhht continues ......30 year old etc etc come on !!!!!!!!!
Since when, should Anyone be punished or Fired on just
BEING ACUSED ??? Then NO-one is safe then !!!!!!
Kav mother the judge foreclosed on the bush parents property GOOGLE IT.
wow, wonder if that girl I helped back in kindergarten will come out and tell everyone I was an ahole! Hell I don't even remember her name!
Sixteen years old (forty-five years ago). At the drive-in movie. In the back seat of my friend Ted's Ford Falcon on a double date with a girl named Peggy.
At some point during "Mothra vs. Godzilla", I tried to put the moves on Peggy, tried unsuccessfully to get to 1st base.
She said NO!. I stopped. She got angry that I even tried, and demanded we take her home right away.
We did.
I guess I can abandon all hope in ever being selected to the Supreme Court.
Should've never nominated him. His paper trail was way to long.Easy pickens for the Dems and Trump cost a seat on the court as Reps. will lose the Senate after Kavanaugh goes down next week.
@8:07 PM.
This is for a Supreme Court position, the highest court in the land. Setting legal precedents.
Both of these are true: 1) Allegations of sexual assault should never be taken lightly, AND 2) innocence is always the default position unless proven to be guilty.
I suspect, that if the tables were turned, and the nominee wasn't your particular brand of political philosophy, your terms would look quite different.
Personally, I see no reason there should be a statue of limitations in reviewing anything when it comes to such high positions of importance and power.
For legal prosecution of a crime, certainly... but not for review for nomination to high office.
I'm sure you have good reasons though, would love to hear them.
3
Wait 36 yrs
Parents were sued by the judges mother
She is a left wing nut
Can't remember date and time
Didn't mention kav name in THERAPY
She is a commie Socialist
BOUGHT ANS PAID FOR BY SOROS...........
NEXT.
4 CNN ARE PAID OPS FROM SOROS
Post a Comment