The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, April 27, 2017


“Comrade, your statement is factually incorrect.”
“Yes, it is. But it is politically correct.”

he notion of political correctness came into use among Communists in the 1930s as a semi-humorous reminder that the Party’s interest is to be treated as a reality that ranks above reality itself. Because all progressives, Communists included, claim to be about creating new human realities, they are perpetually at war against nature’s laws and limits. But since reality does not yield, progressives end up pretending that they themselves embody those new realities. Hence, any progressive movement’s nominal goal eventually ends up being subordinated to the urgent, all-important question of the movement’s own power. Because that power is insecure as long as others are able to question the truth of what the progressives say about themselves and the world, progressive movements end up struggling not so much to create the promised new realities as to force people to speak and act as if these were real: as if what is correct politically—i.e., what thoughts serve the party’s interest—were correct factually.

Communist states furnish only the most prominent examples of such attempted groupthink. Progressive parties everywhere have sought to monopolize educational and cultural institutions in order to force those under their thumbs to sing their tunes or to shut up. But having brought about the opposite of the prosperity, health, wisdom, or happiness that their ideology advertised, they have been unable to force folks to ignore the gap between political correctness and reality.

Especially since the Soviet Empire’s implosion, leftists have argued that Communism failed to create utopia not because of any shortage of military or economic power but rather because it could not overcome this gap. Is the lesson for today’s progressives, therefore, to push P.C. even harder, to place even harsher penalties on dissenters? Many of today’s more discerning European and American progressives, in possession of government’s and society’s commanding heights, knowing that they cannot wield Soviet-style repression and yet intent on beating down increasing popular resistance to their projects, look for another approach to crushing cultural resistance. Increasingly they cite the name of Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937), a brilliant Communist theoretician for whom “cultural hegemony” is the very purpose of the struggle as well as its principal instrument. His writings envisage a totalitarianism that eliminates the very possibility of cultural resistance to progressivism. But owing more to Machiavelli than to Marx or Lenin, they are more than a little complex about the means and are far from identical with the raw sort of power over culture enforced by the Soviet Empire or, for that matter, that is rife among us today.

My purpose here is to explain how progressives have understood and conducted their cultural war from the days of Lenin, and how Gramsci’s own ambiguous writings illustrate the choices they face in conducting that war in our time and circumstances—especially with regard to political correctness in our present culture war.



Anonymous said...

A few famous leaders understood this concept of using propaganda to convince the populace that big government is good for you: Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Castro...Obama. The funny thing is that Obama- and his almost predecessor, Clinton - studied the preaching of Saul Alinsky, who was the US biggest proponent of socialism and often held court on how to accomplish it: get the people dependent on government for the things they need, make them feel like the government is the only entity who can deliver it, then control every aspect of citizens' lives.
In concept it makes sense, so much so, that smart people like Obama and Clinton and, most recently- Gyorgy Soros- agree with it and have tried-successfully- to convince MSM that it's the right way to run our country.
Remember- socialism does not work, except in theory. Never has; never will!! But, on college campuses, they keep teaching that it does.
It's pretty damn scary to think how close we were, until the shot heard round the world on November 9th.

Every morning I get up and remind myself: Trump won- and my day just gets better from there.
The rebellion defeated the Empire and we all lived happily ever after.

Anonymous said...

Politically CORRUPTNESS is more to worry about !!

Anonymous said...

It's Fascism.