The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Monday, June 22, 2015

Yes, Rachel Dolezal Is Black

This week, Rachel Dolezal, the former local head of the Spokane NAACP, a lecturer in Africana studies at Eastern Washington University, and a proud black woman, was revealed to be a non-proud white woman. She lied about her personal history: She said her parents whipped her when they lived in South Africa, that she underwent rape and physical abuse, that the KKK targeted her with swastikas and nooses. No evidence exists to support any of this. Her parents point out that Dolezal has no black ancestry, and grew up in a Montana home as the child of two white parents.

Nonetheless, Dolezal insists she is black. "I was drawing self-portraits with the brown crayon instead of the peach crayon, and black curly hair," she said to Today. "It's a little more complex than me identifying as black or answering a question of, are you black or white?"

Just two weeks ago, the world went gaga over Bruce Jenner's transformation into Caitlyn Jenner; the left passionately insisted that Jenner's genetics, hormones and penis did not mean he could not be a woman. The president of the United States felt the need to tweet out his support for Jenner, stating, "It takes courage to share your story." Anyone who abided by the antiquated notion that biological sex exists was treated as a Neanderthal holdover.

Now, however, the left insists that Rachel Dolezal is not black. On June 9, The Daily Beast headlined, "Caitlyn Jenner Is Pissing Off Feminists and Bigots — Good for Her." Three days later, The Daily Beast headlined, "BREAKING: NAACP 'Stands Behind' Fake Black Woman." The left insists on preserving non-biological, illegitimate racial barriers because they exploit those racial barriers for political gain; the left insists on destroying biologically based sexual differences because they wish to overthrow all established sexual mores.

So what distinguishes Jenner from Dolezal? On what basis can we reject Dolezal's blackness, given that the left has now redefined objective reality as self-definition? If you want to be a woman, you are a woman. If you want to be black, why can't you be black?

More here


Anonymous said...

They are all nuts!!!

Anonymous said...

So by all this thinking that if you think or feel black or male or female then why not a dog, goator even an elephant? Yes today I think I feel like an elephant therefore I am! Welcome to the world of Dr. Seuss!

Anonymous said...

Remember the movie with Steve Martin..."The Jerk"...he was born a poor black child, in her case she was born a poor white child. LOL Maybe she saw this movie too and stole the idea?????

Anonymous said...

"I was drawing self-portraits with the brown crayon instead of the peach crayon, and black curly hair," she said to Today.

As a child, or was that recently? If as a child, it would seem that mom and dad and teachers would have had a few questions about her crayon choices.

Anonymous said...

Someone willing to exploit affirmative action for gain like that is truly a leech on society.

Tina said...

Interviews with her parents and adopted brother paint a very different portrait than she describes of growing up. The pictures of her growing up at home are definitely those of a Caucasian female.

Anonymous said...

12:49 PM Affirmative action is a pox on our society. It only creates more inequality. And anyone that supports it is simply under educated. Its nothing that can't be cured with 2 seconds of rational thought. But most people lack even that ability these days.

Anonymous said...

I will admit...I'm older...and I'm terribly confused. What is going on with people today?