The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Interesting - And Provocative - Take On Connecticut

Friends, there is a gift that God has given me: I can smell something fishy a mile away. Like Benghazi. Almost on day one, I told my husband: “The facts don’t make sense. Something is wrong here.” Last night, after I saw a talking head interview (or, I should say, NOT interview) the father of the boy who saw his teacher get shot and ran for his life with a couple of friends, I told my husband, “Something is not right here. She didn’t ask a single relevant question. So far, this boy is the only eye-witness of the gunman coming forward. She didn’t ask if the boy saw one or more shooters. She didn’t ask any details of what the gunman did first, second, third. She didn’t ask for a description of the gunman. These reporters are complete prostitutes. They could care less about the feelings of the people they interview. So why didn’t she ask any of these questions?” In fact, I could tell she was biting back questions. I looked at my husband and said, “Cal, this thing is starting to stink. By now, there should be many eye-witness accounts of the actual gunman. There should be breathless survivors talking about how this guy walked by their room, etc. About how they narrowly escaped. But so far, it looks like every single eye-witness is dead. That is IMPOSSIBLE!”

I watched the situation LIVE. There were original reports of a second man who was found in the woods that they had put in custody. This man was NEVER spoken of again. Why? The details of the shooting changed enormously from one minute to the next. Inside sources at the police departments were reporting one thing while the official accounts said completely different information. The news reports were full of such ambiguous NON statements that I was furiously looking throughout the internet to find solid evidence or eye-witness accounts to clarify. None was to be found. One example: They originally said that the shooter was buzzed in via the front office’s new video security system. Then, the news report said, “The shooter was NOT voluntarily buzzed into the school.” What the heck does THAT mean? Does that mean he forced his way through the system? Does that mean they have video evidence of his face? Does that mean that there was someone on the inside putting a gun to someone’s head to buzz the shooter in? Huh?


Anonymous said...

It stinks. How msny times in the past have federal authorities been unable to retrieve info off a hard drive. I would like to know how the computer in the shooters house was destroyed. If it was just smashed the whole story is bull

Anonymous said...

Usual standard explanation for events. The Press and blogs run rampant with street gossip/ Air everything said by people repeating what others are saying. MSM and blogs need to get their facts first and than broadcast the FACTS.

Anonymous said...

Its all lies i agree !!! another attempt to further close the vice around our necks ! beware of enemies foriegn or domestic these marxist are trying to rule this video age!! we dont already have footage? Hell 911 we saw it live, but of course no footage of the pentagon? wow that blows mind! fishy fishy yeh id say something is amiss

Anonymous said...

i told you guys from day 1, but my comments were rejected as mean-spirited and incorrect. this was another government set up