Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

New Bill in Congress Could Turn Alternative Media Outlets And YouTube Singers Into Felons

SB 978 is just one more bullet in a broader government effort to end the web as we know it.

In June, Senator Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., introduced SB 978, specifically “to amend the criminal penalty provision for criminal infringement of a copyright, and for other purposes.”

In lay terms, it’s the “illegal streaming bill,” and it would essentially make the streaming of any copyrighted material on the Internet a felony punishable by up to five years in prison. On paper, it sounds innocuous—copyrighted material and the Internet have a contentious history, and efforts to curb piracy have conflicted with the concept of the Internet as a free exchange for information. But SB 978 is a sweeping curtailing of Internet rights under the guise of hindering piracy, and just one more bullet in a broader government effort to end the web as we know it, and snip away at the First Amendment.

Worse is the potential of SB 978 to prosecute those individuals uploading YouTube videos. This will not simply target those people uploading full movies there or to other video streaming sites. It could also be used to curb individual musicians who upload their cover versions of copyrighted songs, a tradition that practically made YouTube what it is today. The nonprofit Fight for the Future is particularly concerned with this aspect, and has launched a campaign called “Free Bieber,” using the example of Justin Bieber’s rise to fame as a way to get out the message. (Ironically, Bieber’s camp has issued a cease-and-desist over using his name in the campaign.)

The implications are far broader than a Bieber, though. When Rufus Wainwright and Sean Lennon covered Madonna’s “Material Girl” at Occupy Wall Street, if someone had uploaded a video of the performance to YouTube, Madonna (or whomever owns her music) could sue the uploader if it’s deemed a “public performance.” Reports the Internet advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF):

2 comments:

lmclain said...

One more step toward toatl government monitoring, contaol, and PUNISHMENT of internet "offenders". Remember what many sage commenters have said, but many more have ignored for various selfish reasons ---- freedom is never taken away at once, but slowly, in increments, until one day, it isn't there anymore. Start THINKING beyond your own tiny little world.

Anonymous said...

Start THINKING beyond your own tiny little world.

November 2, 2011 12:08 PM

Oh, come on. Are you serious? You want people to think for themselves? Hell while you're at it, ask them to take responsibility for themselves as well.

Neither one will happen.