Speaking through her lawyers, Christine Blasey Ford did not explicitly rule out appearing next Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify along with Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh. But echoing Senate Democrats, she said an investigation should be “the first step” before she is put “on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident.”
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Sunday, September 23, 2018
The woman who accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault said an F.B.I. investigation should be a "first step" before she agrees to testify.
Speaking through her lawyers, Christine Blasey Ford did not explicitly rule out appearing next Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify along with Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh. But echoing Senate Democrats, she said an investigation should be “the first step” before she is put “on national television to relive this traumatic and harrowing incident.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Another delaying tactic - hearings testimony under oath is the equivalent of a grand-jury. Have her testify on Monday - or schedule the vote!
If the Republicans are not seeing through the dumbocrat tactics, they should lose the vote and control!
She is being typical Democrat operative. She changes her story several times. She does not tell when she is going to testify. She testifies when hearings are scheduled just like a court date. She cannot demand an investigation by the FBI, She did not report it to the Local authorities which this is their jurisdiction not the FBI.
She wants to testify, she says, but only on her terms. BS. Take vote.
The sole purpose for ALL this is to hold up the confirmation until AFTER the elections...NO other reason. Period
It would be filed in the jurisdiction allegedly happened. City, county or state... Democrats no that... The accuser will not go under oath and will not testify... This is just another character assignation like stormy Daniels
36 years later this anti Trump protester cannot remember when it happened where it happened or who was there...She should be drug through the courts and ruined.
Umm....no....you don't get to demand that the FBI conduct a 'full investigation' in this matter - the statue of limitations ran out a long time ago on this - this is nothing more than yet another ruse to delay to appointment of Judge K until after the mid term elections...vote will go forward on Monday...
She is a PUPPET for the Dems and Soros.
Investigation of what, a single episode of 35 year old, interrupted, drunken, teen lust in which no one was physically injured and of which no report was made to anyone? Sounds like a delaying tactic to me.
She is a liar
maybe Brett Kavanaugh ought to sue her for false accusations
OMG, he has been investigated by the FBI six (6) times already. What do they want, his blood????
Who is she to call for an FBI investigation? She's just a loudmouth punk!
1051-Kavanaugh has hired a lawyer that specializes in defamation.
Maybe, just maybe, the people who own the party house haven't changed the bedspread in thirty-five years, sort of like a Motel 6.
Get the NSA tapes of her conversations with her lawyer in colluding to create this fraud. That would cross state lines and since it's very recent she/they'd be liable.
A citizen just like you and me .Can you see us demanding that the FBI investigate for us. They would still be laughing. She is a liar or she was drunk and it did happen but she just pick Kavanaugh because his mother forclosures on their parents Potomac Maryland home. Do you know who lives in Potomac MD Very Very wealthy people. She is differently a snow flake. Poor little rich girl
Parents probably set up the party before being forclosed on.
You would find Booker, Obama, Soros, Harris on those tapes.
I don't understand how she gets to dictate the terms of any testimony from her.
Post a Comment