Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, December 31, 2016

What if Obama dropped Hillary's email bombs?

The phoniest and most irresponsible lie in current politics is Obama's accusation that "the Russians did it!" Dropped Hillary's email bombs, that is. This was originally just attributed to the CIA and FBI at secondhand, and later those agencies reluctantly agreed. But we all know how badly Obama has corrupted those agencies, and their kowtowing to the Big Boss means nothing. This is sad but true.

If you think about this as a mystery story, you can ask, "Who had the motive, the means, and the opportunity" to leak Hillary's most embarrassing secrets, thereby blowing the election? The list of suspects is huge, but Obama is never mentioned. Still, think about it for a second.

Motive: Obama is a major narcissist who always wants to expand his personal power. Being president has not satisfied his power-hungry ego; nothing ever will. For months he has been talking about running for a third term, and he's back at it today.

Washington speculation has long focused on Obama's ambition to become SecGen of the U.N., an office he could try to expand into a genuine power center to achieve the utopian fantasy of the left, a world order in which everything is "properly" controlled from a dictatorial center. This is consistent with the worst kind of Marxism, but it is also the dream of jihad: world conquest.

More

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The UN is anti christ central. It will spawn and fully support the demon. The UN motto is hail satan.

Anonymous said...

WikiLeaks admitted their source was not the Russians but a DNC insider.

Anonymous said...

That was my first question / guess. He was to envious that she was running and he could not until 2020.

Anonymous said...


By all accounts he has trouble conquering a par 3.

That doesn't mean he has hopes for another cushy spot.

I'm uncertain of the process for appointing a UN head but it's a pretty good bet the permanent members of the Security Council (including the US) each have a veto. Good bet if the job came open, our new president would be disinclined to support Ogolfer.

Beyond that, the Secretary General has always been from a smaller, non-aligned country, IIRC. Don't see that going away.

Ogolfer will just have to make do polishing his Nobel prize.