The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, January 26, 2018

Andrew Napolitano: Wrong To Keep Mass Surveillance Memo Secret

What is the deal with a memorandum by Republican employees at the Intelligence Committee of the United States House of Representatives that allegedly demonstrates very disturbing use of surveillance power through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court not being publicized or shared widely among Congress members until shortly after legislation (S 139) to extend legal authority for such surveillance for six years cleared the Congress?

If the memorandum provides as disturbing of revelations as some Congress members are claiming, every House and Senate member, and the American people too, being able to review it before congressional votes on the bill could have had significant consequences.

Maybe the memorandum’s wide distribution would have resulted in the bill failing to pass, passing with alterations to address problems evidenced in the memorandum, or passing with a significantly shorter reauthorization period. That a small group of Congress members “sat on” the memorandum, keeping its information from their fellow Congress members, legal scholar Andrew Napolitano says in a new interview with host Kennedy at Fox Business, “is either incompetence or malfeasance in office.”

And why is the memorandum now kept secret from the public despite Congress members’ claims that its revelations show reprehensible actions in the US government related to the mass surveillance program? Napolitano, who is the Fox News senior judicial analyst as well as a Ron Paul Institute Advisory Board member, finds this lack of openness intolerable.

Continuing to keep the memorandum secret from the people, Napolitano argues in the interview, is wrong.


1 comment:

lmclain said...

Mass surveillance.
We throw that term around nowadays so easily.
You cheerleaders aren't even ALLOWED to see how pervasive and all encompassing the surveillance is --- to protect "national security".
By "national security", I mean the very skin on their ace.
You are nothing to them. They are too rich, too powerful, too connected, to worry about any of your complaints about something being illegal.
They KNOW you can't DO anything (yet) and they know they are protected by
Two Sets of Laws
If you actually found out what was REALLY going on, you'd find some way to rationalize it. Just like you rationalized the Patriot Act (the greatest act of terror against the American citizen in our history) and the NDAA.
It's gonna be YOUR turn one day.
No one will save you. Rationalize THAT.
Keep cheering.