The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers
Saturday, October 14, 2017
Forensic acoustic proof of SECOND shooter in the Las Vegas massacre
4 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I'm certain the FBI doesn't need this guy to teach them. Maybe there were two gunmen. However, I believe the major fallacy with his argument is his assumption that,if there were two shooters, both were shooting 55 grain 223 rounds. If one was shooting a different round, his distance calculation for the second shooter would be incorrect. If there is a way to triangulate the shots from the information available, that would be the best way to determine location(s) of all shooters.
4 comments:
I'm certain the FBI doesn't need this guy to teach them. Maybe there were two gunmen. However, I believe the major fallacy with his argument is his assumption that,if there were two shooters, both were shooting 55 grain 223 rounds. If one was shooting a different round, his distance calculation for the second shooter would be incorrect. If there is a way to triangulate the shots from the information available, that would be the best way to determine location(s) of all shooters.
No.
Oswald helped him I'm telling ya
Assange has called bluff on all the stories. He is firm that it was an inside production. Sell the fear. Open your eyes sheeple.
Post a Comment