The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Tuesday, May 02, 2017

Stunner: EPA’s CO2 ‘hot spot’ ‘simply does not exist’

Man-made climate change 'should be discarded into the dustbin of other failed theories'

The theory of human-caused global warming is straightforward. The level of the so-called “pollutant” carbon dioxide, or CO2, is rising in the atmosphere, causing a worldwide increase in temperatures that ultimately will have a catastrophic effect on the planet.

To prevent this catastrophe, a vast regulatory infrastructure needs to be created, even if it means sacrificing jobs, economic efficiency, personal freedoms or national sovereignty itself.

But what if CO2 isn’t a pollutant?

That’s precisely the shocking finding of a new report from statistician Jim Wallace, climatologist John Christy and meteorologist Joe D’Aleo, who contend the Environmental Protection Agency erred when it ruled CO2 is a pollutant in 2009.

The researchers claim they could find no evidence that rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations “have had a statistically significant impact on any of the 14 temperature data sets that we analyzed.”

“These analysis results would appear to leave very, very little doubt but that EPA’s claim of a Tropical Hot Spot (THS), caused by rising atmospheric CO2 levels, simply does not exist in the real world,” the report said.


Anonymous said...

Its all a ploy to fund globalism. Gores attempt to invent another internet was based on un proven science.

Anonymous said...

I've been asking this question since Al Gore ran for president. Not that I don't agree or disagree, but global scientists have jumped the gun on the proof. Yes, there is evidence of global warming (the world IS getting warmer), but they've shown proof of the cause.
Remember when you learned the scientific method: you created a theory and THEN proved or disproved that theory. This theory has never been proven, but liberals and MSM talk like it has. They just want more government spending to combat it or control what we do.
Remember when the world was flat, the sun circled the Earth and it was blasphemy to disagree with the "theory" ?
Sound familiar?

Anonymous said...

3 guys vs the almost the rest of scientists in the world? You guys sure do play the odds!