The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, January 02, 2014

Peaceful Secession

Here’s a question that I’ve asked in the past that needs to be revisited. Unless one wishes to obfuscate, it has a simple yes or no answer. If one group of people prefers strong government control and management of people’s lives while another group prefers liberty and desires to be left alone, should they be required to enter into conflict with one another and risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences on the other group? Yes or no. My answer is no; they should be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways.

The problem our nation faces is very much like a marriage in which one partner has an established pattern of ignoring and breaking the marital vows. Moreover, the offending partner has no intention to mend his ways. Of course, the marriage can remain intact while one party tries to impose his will on the other and engages in the deviousness of one-upsmanship and retaliation. Rather than domination or submission by one party, or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I agree. There's just one problem, those that want limited gov't and liberty will not be allowed peaceful secession by those that want a large controlling gov't. They wouldn't have anyone to control if they allowed that to happen, so a peaceful secession is not possible.