By Jay Nordlinger - January 11, 2011
On the radio this morning, Bill Bennett and I had a discussion about the Arizona massacre, and the political use of it made by the Left in this country. A few observations.
In a way, they have won. “They”? I mean, the Krugmans, the Sullivans, the Olbermanns: “They.” They’ve won because we are on their turf, where they have dragged us, or enticed us.
The shooting in Arizona has nothing to do with politics. Nothing to do with Republicans, nothing to do with conservatism. It has nothing to do with the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, you, or me. From what we know, a young psychotic got it into his psychotic head that he would shoot the local congressman, who happened to have a “D.” after her name, rather than an “R.” But the goons and ghouls have pretended that the Republicans spurred this.
And here we are, talking about the massacre and the Republicans, the massacre and national politics, as though there were any connection between these things.
A psychotic described by his classmates as a left-wing pothead shoots a bunch of people. And in the dock is that famous left-wing pothead Sarah Palin. Great, just great. May I pose a question? If the wounded congressman were a Republican instead of a Democrat — I believe the dead judge was a Republican — would we be having a discussion about the massacre and national politics? Would anchormen be running to the scene of the crime?
Jeff Danziger has drawn another odious cartoon, the kind he has long specialized in: Out of a steaming teapot arises an assassin. Get it? The Tea Party. Cool! That’s the way the likes of Danziger want it to be, and practically need it to be. That’s the way they wish it were — no matter what the reality.
I am speaking of the following attitude: A right-winger, instead of a Communist, should have shot Kennedy. A right-winger, instead of a Palestinian immigrant, should have shot Bobby. A right-winger — a Tea Partier! — instead of a young, untreated schizo, should have shot Giffords and those others. I believe that is the attitude on display in that cartoon, and elsewhere.
To say it once more, the Left has kind of won: because we are having a discussion about the Arizona shooting and Republicanism, the Arizona shooting and Sarah Palin, which is not much different from having a discussion about the Arizona shooting and, oh, I don’t know: the price of eggs in Dakar.
Chances are, the Arizona massacre will hurt the Republican party and the Tea Party, stopping or slowing their momentum. Because the Left, “respectable” and not, has, I believe, succeeded in associating the massacre in the public mind with the “Right.” A “veteran Democratic operative” told Politico that President Obama and his team “need to deftly pin this on the Tea Partiers.” Oh, I’m not sure they have to be so deft about it. The Danziger-Krugman way will probably work just fine.
What the irresponsible Left has done in this instance — in its exploitation of a massacre — is so low, so foul, so disgusting, I barely have the words. I mean, turn Paul Wellstone’s funeral into a political rally if you want to. But this? As I said on the Bennett radio show, I’m not a blushing violet, and I know that politics is rough. But to pretend that a murder spree by a psychotic has something to do with those of us who oppose the Democrats’ health legislation and other measures — this is beyond the pale, way beyond it.
I’ve said it before: There are angels and demons on both the right and the left. Neither side has a monopoly on virtue, or its opposite. I’ve made some people chuckle by saying, “Most of the worst people I have known have been on the right. Why? Because I have known so many people on the right! My jobs have seen to that.” I know a lot of angels and demons — of different political stripes.
But the Left’s reaction to this Arizona massacre — “Mission Accomplished, Sarah Palin,” and all that? Very, very hard to take. It is indeed hard to share a conversation, a political culture, a society, with such people.
11 comments:
Watch a Harry Potter movie and you may conclude his series are responsible. For all the sickoes out their, how about praying that this victim comes out of this tragedy with a mental health even at your level.
What the left is doing in the midst of this tragedy is far more provocative and incendiary than anything the right has been accused of.
I wonder if it is just some opportunistic jerks trying to push their agenda while emotions are high, or if it is actually an attempt to provoke something that might give them an excuse to go nuclear.
Either way, the tension is rising... if the left is really as concerned about the rhetoric as they claim, they'd do well to just sit down and shut up.
The old guy covered and shielded his wife. Thats love man, when someone elses safety, future and happiness is more important to you than anything you desire or think you want, thats love. I am a lucky man.
I couldnt imagine not seeing one of my daughters ever again, I havent had that kind of pain. I have felt pain, not like that. My wife would have to take responsibility and deal with it, but Im gonna get him and Im gonna do what a dad has to do. Right or wrong. Is that crazy? Not to me. Im gonna get him.
No guts No glory
The right has made much rhetoric of armed revolt and invokes the second amendment as a solution.
The right has a leader who cannot stop using violent imagery and repeating incendiary falsehoods.
The right owns this one.
The 'right' does NOT own this, 9:39.
The lone psycho who pulled the trigger owns it.
He has LEFT leanings, and his history with Giffords predates Palin and any 2nd amendment rhetoric, but that doesn't really matter.
He acted on his own, and NOBODY owns it but him.
if responsible law abiding citizens were allowed to carry firearms, how many rounds would this piece of crap gotten off before someone took him out. a father might still be tucking his 9 year old daughter into bed ...
9:39-The right owns this one? Are you really that ignorant or did somebody pay you to post this stupid comment?
the reason a republican doesnt get shot is because they can usually shoot back.
5:50, you're right that states where the citizenry are lawfully armed, have much lower violent crime than those states, like Maryland, where it's nearly impossible to obtain a concealed carry permit. It doesn't apply in this situation though, because in Arizona a permit is not required to openly carry a firearm and a concealed carry permit can be obtained by any law abiding citizen who is willing to undergo a rigourous training program which covers things like fire arms safety, legal liability, marksmanship, etc. I would have expected there to have been a host of lawfully armed civilians close by to have stepped in to neutralize the threat that could have saved many lives that day. Where were they?
Post a Comment