Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Wisconsin Judge Rules in Favor of Religious Freedom

Religious institutions exempt from nondiscrimination ordinance addressing gender identity in public accommodation

A county judge in Wisconsin ruled last month that the city of De Pere's nondiscrimination ordinance infringed on the right of religious freedom, granting a victory to five churches and a religious broadcaster which brought a legal challenge against the statute.

In late 2017, De Pere adopted a nondiscrimination ordinance that, among other issues, addressed "gender identity and sexual orientation in housing, employment, advertising, and public accommodation," according to World magazine. The new policies were to apply to all "places of public accommodation."

Five churches and a local religious broadcaster challenged the ordinance. The plaintiffs' complaint argued that the city's ordinance differed from similar statutes in other states as "the De Pere ordinance does not clearly exempt religious organizations." They contended that "the ordinance is likely to be imposed on churches and other religious organizations in a manner that would mandate government orthodoxy in core religious functions, communication, and conduct."

More specifically, the churches asked the judge to determine whether they fell under the statute's definition of discrimination, given that the plaintiffs "hold views relative to family and marital status, religion, sex, gender identity and sexual orientation for which they make employment and facilities-use decisions. Additionally, each of the religious institutions notices, promotes, publishes and otherwise disseminates their views relating to these topics on certain communication-platforms including their websites and for some, blogs, and the radio."

More

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a big one.

Anonymous said...

Everyone is free to believe whatever. It does not have to be an affirming institution if you truly believe.

Anonymous said...

Yep... I'm an Atheist and I think the judge made the right call.

I'm not sure that this is a ruling about religious freedom per se, it is about weather a Church is considered a "place of public accommodation", there by binding it to the same laws everyone else has to follow. The judge correctly ruled that a Church should not be considered as such, there by not holding them to the law.