1. Hampstead
Population: 6,365
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.31
Property crimes per 1,000: 7.38
Total crime: 4.26% violent, 95.74% property
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.31
Property crimes per 1,000: 7.38
Total crime: 4.26% violent, 95.74% property
2. Manchester
Population: 4,820
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.41
Property crimes per 1,000: 3.53
Total crime: 11.76% violent, 88.24% property
Population: 4,820
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.41
Property crimes per 1,000: 3.53
Total crime: 11.76% violent, 88.24% property
3. Thurmont
Population: 6,507
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.92
Property crimes per 1,000: 10.45
Total crime: 8.82% violent, 91.18% property
Population: 6,507
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.92
Property crimes per 1,000: 10.45
Total crime: 8.82% violent, 91.18% property
4. Bowie
Population: 58,631
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.94
Property crimes per 1,000: 12.89
Total crime: 7.28% violent, 92.72% property
Population: 58,631
Violent crimes per 1,000: 0.94
Property crimes per 1,000: 12.89
Total crime: 7.28% violent, 92.72% property
5. Glenarden
Population: 6,390
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.41
Property crimes per 1,000: 10.49
Total crime: 13.43% violent, 86.57% property
Population: 6,390
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.41
Property crimes per 1,000: 10.49
Total crime: 13.43% violent, 86.57% property
6. Ocean Pines
Population: 12,207
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.56
Property crimes per 1,000: 8.68
Total crime: 17.92% violent, 82.08% property
Population: 12,207
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.56
Property crimes per 1,000: 8.68
Total crime: 17.92% violent, 82.08% property
7. Taneytown
Population: 6,749
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.78
Property crimes per 1,000: 9.19
Total crime: 19.35% violent, 80.65% property
Population: 6,749
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.78
Property crimes per 1,000: 9.19
Total crime: 19.35% violent, 80.65% property
8. Frostburg
Population: 8,601
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.98
Property crimes per 1,000: 18.02
Total crime: 10.97% violent, 89.03% property
Population: 8,601
Violent crimes per 1,000: 1.98
Property crimes per 1,000: 18.02
Total crime: 10.97% violent, 89.03% property
9. Bel Air
Population: 10,200
Violent crimes per 1,000: 2.16
Property crimes per 1,000: 25.00
Total crime: 8.63% violent, 91.37% property
Population: 10,200
Violent crimes per 1,000: 2.16
Property crimes per 1,000: 25.00
Total crime: 8.63% violent, 91.37% property
10. Easton
Population: 16,689
Violent crimes per 1,000: 2.52
Property crimes per 1,000: 27.68
Total crime: 9.09% violent, 90.91% property
Population: 16,689
Violent crimes per 1,000: 2.52
Property crimes per 1,000: 27.68
Total crime: 9.09% violent, 90.91% property
8 comments:
I thought Ocean Pines fell under Berlin. It does for most other things, except this.
Bowie? Now that was surprising.
Number Six is NOT safe if you are a goose.
Regardless, the crime rate is low there....hmmm....wonder why that is??? Could Ocean Pines be well Policed? Could the tax rate be high? Could real estate be high? Gee, I wonder why all of the named cities on this list are so low on the crime scale....no section 8 housing?
Pooooooe dabury
No way in hell does Glenarden belong on this list. None.
Easton's property crimes are pretty high. If you don't nail it down, it will be someone else's before too long.
I'm not a goose
Post a Comment