They're not protesters, they're violent criminal thugs
After a second night of rioters in Charlotte staging violent unrest, looting, attacking bystanders, attacking journalists, setting fires, smashing up cars, smashing up businesses and shooting at each other, the media is stilldescribing the criminal thugs behind the rampage as “protesters”.
Stealing and looting cash registers from local businesses is NOT a legitimate form of protest.
More/Video
4 comments:
Why isn't the "media" mentioning that it is against the law to pay people to riot and George Soros is doing it? 70% of those arrested from out of town?????
What is unfolding in Charlotte is objectively, manifestly, provably NOT a protest. It’s a violent, unjustified riot by criminals and thugs.
Why is the media giving it legitimacy by still referring to it as a protest?
If mobs of white supremacists were looting stores, setting fires, attacking journalists and shooting guns, would the media call it a protest?
Agreed! They aren't carrying signs and squawking about their problems. They're being aggressive and violent, destroying property, looting and stealing.
Whatever happened to "Looters Shot On Sight"?
Anonymous said...
What is unfolding in Charlotte is objectively, manifestly, provably NOT a protest. It’s a violent, unjustified riot by criminals and thugs.
Why is the media giving it legitimacy by still referring to it as a protest?
If mobs of white supremacists were looting stores, setting fires, attacking journalists and shooting guns, would the media call it a protest?
September 24, 2016 at 4:48 PM
If it was members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans rioting over taking the battle flag down and moving and tearing down the Confederate monuments do you think the media would call it protesting? Do you think the police would just stand by? Do you think mayors and governors would give them space? No, the National Guard would move in and arrest everyone of them that is white!
Post a Comment