On Thursday’s Breitbart News Daily, SiriusXM host Alex Marlow asked guest Roger Stone about the Vogue interview with Hillary Clinton’s aide Huma Abedin, who said her Muslim faith helped her get through the sexting scandals of her husband, disgraced former Congressman Anthony Weiner.
“It’s an attempt, of course, to clean Huma up, and make her respectable, even sympathetic, for voters,” said Stone. “Vogue has been a great enabler and advocate for Hillary Clinton, which is ironic, in view of Hillary’s role in bullying, intimidating, and threatening the various women who have been her husband’s sexual assault victims. Are those the actions of a feminist, or an advocate for women? I think not.”
“It is funny, yesterday there were quite a few Tweets online saying, oh, Steve Bannon and Roger Stone, they are advocates for the conspiracy theory about Huma,” Stone observed, referring to Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon, who has become the chief executive officer of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
“No conspiracy theory – this is really simple,” Stone explained. “Her parents were funders of the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs, also active in the World Muslim League – both funded by the radical sheikh Omar Abdul Naseef, who also founded the Rabita Trust, identified by the Department of Justice as one of the funders of the attack on America on 9/11. Those are indisputable facts.”
“It’s ironic that Huma also comes out of the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs, as did Mr. Khan, who of course got quite a bit of press at the Democratic convention last week. Two radical Islamic organizations,” he continued. (The Democratic convention was held July 25-28.)
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
3 comments:
It is a puzzlement.
Isn't Weiner Jewish? I find a lot of this so utterly ironic and baffling at the same time to have a Jew and a Muslim marry. I'm not saying that it doesn't or hasn't happened before but it seems that if she was really from a Muslim fundamentalist group (or whatever it is that you want to call it, that marrying a Jew would be the last thing that would happen. The marriage between them had to be purely political, just like everything else that seems to take place in this woman's life. I bet that Hilliary had something to do with that arrangement.
Just my two cents. By the way, I have no opinion on who marries who so please don't consider my remarks to be bigoted, I am merely making an observation.
1:23 your observation is correct,if it wasn't political she would have been killed by her own family.She is a spy for radical Muslim groups and should be in prison along with Hillery
Post a Comment