Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Governing With A Rod Of Iron


“The Magic and Machinations of One Party Rule”

By Delegate Michael A. McDermott

No matter what side you come down on the issue of same sex marriage in Maryland, you should be offended by the process through which the O’Malley-Brown Gay Marriage Bill (HB-438) passed through the House of Delegates.

We can start with a governor who changed his mind on the issue. Who first pushed for Civil Unions…who then agreed that “the people” should be allowed to vote by referendum…who then made same sex “marriage” a primary legislative focus for 2012. It’s funny as I recall those Eastern Shore democratic legislators telling us how the governor’s focus was going to be on, “Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!”…I just didn’t realize they were talking about wedding planners.

Consider the title of the bill: “Civil Marriage Protection Act”. Titles are intentionally crafted in Annapolis to disguise their intent. After all, when you want to change the definition of marriage, which has been in place since the beginning of time, you start by telling the people you simply wish to “protect” marriage. What kind of caldron produces this stuff?

The committee process in the House was something to behold as well. All of the previous same sex wedding bills have been assigned to the Judiciary Committee, until now. For the first time, in a highly irregular move, the bill was put forward to two committees: Judiciary and Health and Government Operations. The reason was simple: after all their machinations and arm twisting last session, they now lacked the votes to get a favorable vote from the Judiciary members. So, they went committee shopping and found one that would serve their purpose.

Historically, in the rare instances when two committees are utilized for a bill hearing, one of the committees is assigned as “primary” and the other as “secondary”. In this case, Judiciary was the primary committee of record. For voting purposes, the primary committee should vote first before the issue is moved to the secondary committee members. If the vote fails in the primary, it should not move to the secondary. In the case of the O’Malley-Brown Same Sex Marriage Bill, the committee votes were joined together in order to garner the number of votes necessary to claim a “favorable” vote. The fact is, the Judiciary Committee voted “No”, while Health and Government Operations voted “Yes”. The HGO vote was all on partisan lines which is exactly what the Speaker was counting on in the end. They say this has been done before, but no one can remember the last time it was done this way. That speaks volumes.

The combined committees also reviewed amendments offered on the bill with all of them being rejected. Some votes were closer than others. There was an effort to put the issue before the voters as a referendum which had bi-partisan support, but fell short of the votes needed. Following this meeting and voting session, the bill was moved to the House where it was laid over for a day to allow for others to offer amendments.

On Friday morning, a joint meeting of the committees was held to review amendments offered on the bill. I was told there were 200 amendments at the desk waiting for this bill. While many were no doubt duplicitous, the committees would normally review and vet each amendment to determine if it should be adopted into the bill. Our joint meeting lasted about thirty seconds and we were all told that any amendments would be offered and debated on the floor of the House. The rush was on and the fix was in. This action was one of the biggest downfalls of the process, but the next action was even worse.

All bills deserve a free and fair debate. Monumental legislation that seeks to change historic references and definitions should not be rushed. When we came into session on Friday afternoon, the bill was only on Second Reader. This is the time in the process where amendments can be offered to a House Bill by any member from the floor. Normally, these amendments are offered to the respective committee where they can be reviewed, vetted, and debated. There is great reluctance to amend a bill on the floor since that vetting process has not occurred and members are understandably skeptical. I have seen amendments made or questions asked on bills that resulted in a bill being Special Ordered until the matter could be thoroughly addressed and vetted by the assigned committee.

As this bill was debated and amendments offered on Second Reader in the House, there were some clear issues with some of the amendments being offered. Interestingly enough, one of the amendments which had been rejected in committee was offered again on the floor by Delegate Wade Kach (a Baltimore County Republican who did a 180 after a midnight meeting with the governor and decided to vote “Yes” on the bill). Magically now, the amendment was said to be “favorable” by the committee. Of course, this was not true as the same amendment had been rejected. Apparently being part of the deal, the amendment to delay the effective date of the bill to Jan. 1, 2013 was then agreed to by the House.

A second amendment was more troubling. It was a more complicated, technical amendment regarding judicial severability of the bill. It was offered by Delegate Tiffany Alston, a Prince Georges County Democrat who is currently under indictment for election financial fraud. She was originally against the bill and voted against it in committee. Out of the blue, she advised that if her amendment was passed, she would vote in favor of the bill. Her amendment, which she never even spoke of in committee, was said to be “supported by the committee”. It passed and what followed immediately was a significant exodus from the chamber of senior democrats…they knew it was over and they had her vote.

In the fog of war and the battles on the floor of the State House, rumors and scuttlebutt abound. Many are born out of speculation, many based upon practical experience, and many because they are simply true. Two republicans voted with the democrats on this bill. Both had previously said they would not do so. Both, it seems, met privately with the governor in the days before the bill went to the floor. It was said by many that “jobs” were on the table…commission appointments…board appointments…one can only speculate. Weighing out what constitutes thirty pieces of silver in this economy can be tough.

On the Democratic side of the House, Delegate Alston has criminal charges pending to be resolved after session. The case against her was said to be very strong, but was also rumored to have been filed by a governor appointed State’s Attorney following her strong opposition to the Same Sex Marriage bill offered last session. She too had a reported private meeting with the Governor the day before. Another aging Democrat from Baltimore City was rumored to have sold out for a relative who is seeking better state employment opportunities. Only time will tell, but I will leave it to the citizens to do the math.

Come to think of it…maybe this is a jobs bill after all!

On Friday, I again had the opportunity to witness two sunrises and two sunsets in one calendar day…all from my seat on the House floor. Second Readers take place on one day and are followed, generally, on the proceeding day as a Third Reader. However, wishing to plow, ram, shove, this bill through in one day required the magical waiving of the Speaker’s Mace to create another Legislative daybreak…complete with the Pledge of Allegiance and official Prayer of the Day. This was the same tactic utilized to pass the Alcohol Tax last session.

So what normally would have and should have taken a few days to perform with due diligence was forced out of the House within just a few hours. The result on the board for all to see was a vote count showing 71 “Yes” and 67 “No”. It seems now that even this was an illusion.

Following the vote, there was a press release which indicated the count was “72-67”, but that is not what appeared on the voting board. The tally board indicated “71” so something has happened to the count that has not been reflected in actions taken on the floor. Delegate Bahanon (Democrat from St. Mary’s County) would appear to be that extra vote, although he was missing in action on the final count.

It is said you need “71” to pass anything in the House of Delegates, but good leadership is not based on vote total of 71. We are a house divided which cannot stand. It is for this very purpose that consensus must be sought and developed among the people whom we purport to represent. Our leadership has assured us that we will remain divided and, as we move forward, issues will arise which find their Genesis of division in these very votes. It is not “courageous” leadership that squeaks a bill through via machinations, rather it is partisan witchcraft.

I cannot know for certain about jobs promised, or not…I cannot know for certain about other situations which may bring comfort to some for a green vote…but I do know that this issue will only serve to further divide our state at a time when we can ill afford that same division. There will be a referendum of the people (the second one against this governor and the democratic machine) on the definition of “marriage” once the Senate takes their “courageous” vote. Of this we can be sure. There is another vote of which we can be sure as well. It is the one which will occur in November of 2014 when those who put their green vote up on the board will have to answer to those whose place setting they hold in trust.

Keep a watchful eye out for bills that seek to change the referendum process in Maryland to make it tougher on those gathering signatures. Surely this will be tried.

People of Maryland, take back your state!

20 comments:

mack said...

YEA RIGHT U R RIGHT TAKE BACK OUR STATE....LOL HAHA
Only why we can take back our state is to VOTE ALL out of Office and get a third party in the state and maybe things will change when we have more options to vote on for office other than the same old lairs...

Anonymous said...

Most people in Maryland are LIBERAL, so there for we can't take our state back! Conservatives will just have to get out of dodge! Go where we can make a difference. MARYLAND SUCKS!!!

Anonymous said...

Thank you Sir for taking the time to keep the spot light on the wretched.

"People of Maryland, take back your state!"
Tell us how! Tell us what the most significant move would be.

Off topic but, Can you help us defeat the increases fast approaching this year:
boat registration increases as much as $250.
Federal Migratory stamp increases $15 to $25
Hunting License increase $24.5 to $95
Coupled with all the other tax and fee increases in 1 year, this wil destroy future generations of Conservationist.
Please help us save our Heritage Sir

Anonymous said...

We can't take back our state. The population centers of Montgomery, PG counties and Baltimore City rule this state. As they vote, so goes the state.

The only way to make changes are term limits for all elected offices or for the shore to secede. Secession won't happen because of the liberal governing powers.

That leaves the option of moving out of state

Anonymous said...

MARYLAND SUCKS!!!

February 19, 2012 2:23 PM

Along with its' education programs. Most notably on here, English.

Anonymous said...

I think it is great Mike contributes to your blog. Just like Contributor used to.

Ironshire said...

Once again we're the laughing stock of the country. I don't mean the Untied States, I mean the Country. Those of us that live outside of the sewage filled cities.
I can't wait for the referendum to start. I'll be signing up to sign up every "right" thinking Worcester County voter.

Thanks, Mike. I can't imagine how many Tums you had to eat while watching this debacle go on. I'm sure you "let fly" in Newark on Saturday... Somehow that always relieves the stress.

On to the referendum and the election in 2 years.

Craig Theobald
Ironshire

Beezer said...

Reference 3:27

There is another way for our region to achieve autonomy.

A secession move. If Queen Anne, Kent, Caroline, Talbot, Dorchester, Wicomico, Worcester, & Somerset Counties would referendum the proposed secession - then we could declare our mandate.

Then - Hillary Clinton -(Secretary of State) - could approach our US Congress and ask for recognition of our independence. Instead of actively being involved in setting-up a separate Palestinian State - I say bring her home and let her negotiate our freedom here at home first.

Anonymous said...

I would rather move out of this state and take my education/job with me. I am not all opposed out by the marriage laws, it is the TAXES that is killing my family and my quality of life. I want something better for my children.

Anonymous said...

I've got to thank Mr. McDermott for his reports back to his employers, the people of Wicomico. Yes, Mike, God is great. beer is good, and people are crazy!

Anonymous said...

I just posted, but in the meantime the old "lets succeed" argument came back. I can tell you that Talbot and Queen Anne's would never even consider such a move.
It seems like a great idea until you really think about the consequences of this. Can you imagine anyone from our area being a governor? Just who would you want to be our senators? I almost laugh at the thought. We cannot even manage our own schools let alone our own state.

Anonymous said...

I couldn't agree more Anonymous 4:52pm

Beezer said...

Reference 5:40 Posting

I would be willing to wager a bet that Talbot and Queen Anne would agree to the referendum.

I have it on high authority that these two counties would be most interested in promulgating a referendum for the express purpose declaring there independence from the western Shore.

This process has been done in the past - i.e. West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina.

Anonymous said...

6:02pm Your such a dreamer!

Beezer said...

To 6:25 Post

Think about it for a moment. What has the legislature done to the easternshore counties this year.
I'll give you a brief overview of the damage they have done:

1. Plan Maryland - circumvents local autonomy and/or self determination. HB-253

2. Schoolteachers pension bailout - millions in additional taxes. HB-87, HB-1332

3. Stolen virtually all our local Fuel tax revenues and then diverted it to the western shore to the MTA and now proposes 6% sales tax on top of State Fuel Tax.
HB-1302

4. Doubling & Tripling our flush tax. HB-446

5. Increasing State Income Tax Rates. HB-836

6. Decreasing State Income Tax deductions. HB-87

7. Increasing Chesapeake Bay Bridge tolls - HB-1157

8. Increase Millionairs Tax - HB-784

A brief look at our nations illustrious history will reveal that the Tea Party rucus was minor to what has happened to our citizenry here on the easternshore. If ever there was a seccession movement - it is now!

Anonymous said...

I may be wrong but I bet an analysis of the numbers would show that the Eastern Shore gets more state money back than what they pay in taxes.

Anonymous said...

O'Malley's political philosophy, along with that of his supporters is very destructive to the financial and moral well being of our state. As long as voters continue to elect such persons, there is very little hope that our state will move up in either of these areas.

7:24PM is probably on the right track with the secession movement recommendation.

Anonymous said...

To 8:03 - I don't think so. If that were the case - then why does Maryland hide most all of the distribution figures.

I want to see how much sales tax is returned back to each locality. I also want to see the amount of fuel taxes that is returned back to each locality. I also want to see how much of the car registration, titling, licensing, is returned back to the locality.

Until full transparency is realized - I say put a cork on the lid.

Anonymous said...

7:24 - You forgot to mention about gay marrages now being shoved down our throats. Any easternshoreman worth his salt can see that it is abnormal for a man to be joined to a man.

The anatomy is just not compatible.

Anonymous said...

From the actions coming out of Annapolis, it's clear that MD is doing a great job of getting criminals off the street.