Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, November 06, 2011

Republicans in Early-Voting States May Be Giving Cain Benefit Of The Doubt

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Republicans in early voting states like Iowa seem to be giving Herman Cain the benefit of the doubt for now -- but they also say they need to know more, nearly a week after the disclosure that he was accused of sexually harassing women who worked for him in the 1990s.


"It's concerning, but it's not a big deal," said Cindy Baddeloo of suburban Des Moines, one of more than two dozen undecided Republican voters interviewed in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina in the days since the allegations -- which Cain has repeatedly denied -- surfaced.






6 comments:

CAIN for President in 2012 said...

Cain will replace this clown we now have in the White House!

Anonymous said...

Paul/ Cain

Anonymous said...

Have the stupid democrats forgot about Clinton? Smoke another one for me.

Anonymous said...

The media ignored the affair Obama had with Larry Sinclair.

Anonymous said...

Cain denied all along that he made suggestive comments to female subordinates while serving as president of the National Restaurant Association. Yet, over the past five days, he has given conflicting accounts about what, if anything, he knew about the alleged incidents as well as whether he knew about financial settlements two of his accusers reportedly received from the trade group.
He's blamed the mainstream media, liberals and Perry's campaign, which said it had nothing to do with it. A black conservative, Cain has said his race has played a factor in the turmoil.
And Friday, a lawyer for one of Cain's accusers disclosed that she alleged "several incidents of sexual harassment" in a complaint filed more than a decade ago, a fresh accusation that complicated the Republican presidential hopeful's determined bid to lay the politically explosive controversy to rest.

Translation: He changes/modifies his statements when it is decided they are not popular.

How can he deny them when payoffs/settlements were paid on his behalf? lol I wonder what he will say tomorrow.

Anonymous said...

he said he didn't know what the company did on his behalf.