Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, January 20, 2019

Dianne Feinstein Pushes Ban on 205 Commonly Owned Semiautomatic Guns

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is pushing to ban 205 commonly owned semiautomatic firearms.

The various firearms, pistols among them, are to be prohibited under the Assault Weapons Ban of 2019, introduced by Dianne Feinstein.

On January 10, 2019, Breitbart News reported that the ban was focused on commonly owned semiautomatic firearms and “high-capacity” magazines.

Feinstein announced on Twitter: “Americans across the nation are asking Congress to reinstate the federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. If we’re going to put a stop to mass shootings and protect our children, we need to get these weapons of war off our streets.”

A press release describing the ban explains that Feinstein is gunning for 205 specific commonly owned semiautomatic firearms. Additionally, she calls for a ban on any “assault pistol” that weighs more than 50 ounces, and she seeks a ban on “assault pistol stabilizing braces that transform assault pistols into assault rifles by allowing the shooter to shoulder the weapon and fire more accurately.”

More

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Civil war is COMING.

Anonymous said...

She is correct in saying "get them off the street " , but that is all . No ban of any kind , enforce the present laws now .

OATH KEEPERS said...

lol

ahhhhhh....no

Anonymous said...

Americans will be disarmed prior to the financial collapse and new currency installment.

It is a must do.

Anonymous said...

She is an idiot!! "Protect our children"..... like she cares about children!!

Anonymous said...

Too bad we can't feed her to the Islamic Terrorists so that they can introduce her to a blade of rusted steel and then she would realize she made a mistake.

Anonymous said...

We must push our representatives to introduce a Bill that makes violating Constitutional Rights a felony...ten year min sentence. The sooner we start contacting them the better chance we have of making these infringements stop before its too late.....

Anonymous said...

No it’s not.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the guy who said we must be disarmed. It is an agenda for this government and all modern governments. Most other governments (as we know) have already outlawed gun ownership for the population. It is a critical "must do" action for any self-interested tyrannical criminal government. And the US Government wrote the book on self-interested, tyrannical, criminal government. We all know it. They MUST disarm us before everyone catches on that the US Dollar has ZERO value against all other currencies. It is an obvious globalist scheme to bring down the US the same way their fathers brought down Germany. And Great Britian.

So yes, I agree that the US population must be and will be disarmed by this government. One way or another.

Anonymous said...

We won’t.

Anonymous said...

Ohhh yes it is Snowflake and I can't wait.tick tock.

Anonymous said...

YOUR A TRAITOR.MOVE TO N KOREA.

Anonymous said...

Only When "They Pry My dead Cold Hands Off My Weapons " !!

Anonymous said...

So she proposes a law that reduces the accuracy of firearms? How safety minded of her. The only firearms her bill will allow, are the ones that can't hit the broad side of a barn door. There wouldn't actually be any "arms" then. Just worthless noise makers. And that's a serious breach of the second amendment.

Anonymous said...

What a nasty, anti-constitution congressperson. I hope America will remember the Cavanaugh confirmation hearings and how she conducted herself and the circus proceedings in trying to tarnish a respected jurist's career.

Anonymous said...

Who? From where? Say no more.

Anonymous said...

No it’s not.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if that will include the fifteen-round cannons her security undoubtedly carries.

Anonymous said...

231 What's your plan snowflake? Have you ever shot a gun? Other then "classified" military you can't talk about ? Ha