Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, November 24, 2018

Politicians & Police Set Tyranny's Perfect Example: Gun Confiscation

As a review of some of the current events that have been taking place in the U.S. recently, on 11/5/18, Anne Arundel County Police in Maryland shot and killed a man as they attempted to exercise a “red flag” gun removal order.

Those “red flag” orders went into effect on October 1 of this year. Let’s take the definition of this new “game” directly from Wikipedia and examine it:

A red flag law is a “gun violence protection” law that permits police or family members to petition a state court to order the temporary removal of firearms from a person who may present a danger to others or themselves. A judge makes the determination to issue the order based on statements and actions made by the gun owner in question. After a set time, the guns are returned to the person from whom they were seized unless another court hearing extends the period of confiscation. Such orders are known as “Extreme Risk Protection Orders” (ERPO) in Oregon, Washington, Maryland, and Vermont, as “Risk Protection Orders” in Florida as “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” in California; as “risk warrants” in Connecticut; and as “Proceedings for the Seizure and Retention of a Firearm” in Indiana.

Returning to the incident in Maryland, take a look at this excerpt from CBS News from 11/6/18:

Neither of the officers were injured. Their names weren’t released.

It wasn’t clear why the “red flag” order was issued. A spokeswoman for the Maryland Judiciary denied a request from the Baltimore Sun to release protection order requests associated with the home, citing the law which states the orders are confidential unless a court rules otherwise. Michele Willis, the man’s niece, told the Baltimore Sun that one of her aunts requested the protective order against Willis, but she declined to say why.

Maryland’s law, which went into effect Oct. 1, is more broad in that it allows certain health care providers to seek an order, in addition to family members and law enforcement.

More

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

They can't take them if they can't find them.

Anonymous said...

We used to be free

lmclain said...

They can't take them if you open fire first.
The SECOND group of back-up SWAT will kill you, but it's better to die fighting back against Nazi BS then it is to die on your knees.
Buy the highest rated penetrating ammo on the market and when the dogs start barking at 4-5am, fire to the left and right of the doorway.
Put on headgear for the upcoming flash-bang and forced entry.
Put THAT on the charging documents.
Wait.
There AREN'T any charges? Whaaatt???
Open fire FIRST.
The JEWS wish they had done that, believe it.
Or, keep cheering. They'll get to you soon enough.

Anonymous said...

Can not take them if they are in a gun trust. People need to check into a gun trust.

Anonymous said...

I've witness High Chair Lewis and his Sherrif gang, harass, taunt, bully, conduct warrantless searches right here in our county based on someone's statement without proofii

I've been a subject of these warrantless searches (.WITNESSED BY MY NEIGHBORS). bumped and bullied by these deputies for the same law noted here....that was enforced years ago by my CRAZY EX WIFE.

two of my guns he kept....even though it was tossed out

My lawyer knows about this.....and we are not free anymore

Anonymous said...

Civil war is coming.