Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Thursday, September 22, 2016

Changing who controls ICANN jeopardizes our presidential election

Changing who controls the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) so close to our presidential election will jeopardize the results of how you vote on Nov. 8 unless Congress stops this changeover.

When the calendar hits Sept. 30, a mere 6 weeks before our election, the United States cannot be assured that if any web site is hacked, the responsible party will be held accountable. We cannot be sure if a web site is valid. We cannot be sure if one country is being favored over another. These are all the things ICANN is responsible for and has worked perfectly since the Internet was created.

Why change it now and so close to the election? Why does that matter to you as a voter?

Take a look at recent cyber activity as it relates to the election. The Democratic National Convention was breached comprising the entire party’s strategy, donor base, and indeed, national convention. Everything the DNC had done to prepare for a moment four years in the making (if not longer) was undermined by a hacker who had been in their system for some time but waited for the optimal moment to spring it on the DNC – opening day of the convention. The FBI and other U.S. agencies, as the headlines blare, suspect Russia is responsible for the hack. Recently, Vladimir Putin went so far as to say, "Does it matter who broke in? Surely what's important is the content of what was released to the public.”

It matters to all of us whether we live in the United States or not, if a hostile country can undermine our democratic process. There is even more alarming evidence this is happening during this election cycle..

More here

3 comments:

steve said...

Just for the election? How about America's future? It's OUR internet to share with others! There's no price that should buy it.

Anonymous said...

As a person who works in IT, specifically in DNS and internet addressing. That is not how it works, and Theresa Payton should be ashamed for spreading this crap around.

Anonymous said...

Please, 1:02, explain why giving away something we invented and own to the rest of the world's control is a smart move.

I am waiting with baited breath.

What if China decided I could no longer have my website for their own reasons?