Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, July 29, 2016

James P. Ireton v. Lore Chambers

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Doesn't matter, doesn't change the fact that he is a POS

Anonymous said...

6:04 AM - You beat a lot of us to the punch with that statement.

Anonymous said...

It is truly amazing how this young lady was treated to create an opening. Why did pick Pick leave retirement or another better job offer??

Anonymous said...

How city government is done in salisbury,then mayor gets into a cat fight to purposely enable him to CREATE a vacancy for his "buddy" now you have Day creating an illusion of some great downtown revitalization but the only contractor signs ever seen are " Gillis Gilkerson " how in the world is continued abuse of mayor's office and blatant violation of ethics tolerated

Anonymous said...

Looks like Junior slid under the radar again

Anonymous said...

We haven't heard much from Ireton since he got whipped in the election in the spring, the biggest defeat numbers coming from his own district's voters, people who voted overwhelmingly for a political unknown who never once campaigned here, or actually campaigned at all.

Ireton spent tens of thousands of dollars to go exactly nowhere except back to a city council seat that he vacated in the middle of his term in the middle of the night over a decade ago.

Anonymous said...

Just another pos democrap getting away with breaking the laws of our land. If he were GOP, he'd have been in jail by now. Applause for the opinion that it involved a case about NOTHING. Too bad our courts have to deal with such frivolity.

Anonymous said...

How is it possible to have assault without malice? While premeditation may not have been the case, an actual assault demonstrates the intent to do harm because you acted on the impulse. If they found him guilty of assault, the intent was there, even if it was for a milisecond.

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised either one would spend more money fighting over no money. The only one who wins in like that is the lawyer filing the paperwork.

Anonymous said...

correct. for an assault there has to be malice aforethought. not a fan of either of them personally, but at the point malice was out, judgment should have been against Chambers.