Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Sweetheart deal? Unions allowed to cut retiree benefits rather than fix underfunded pensions

The United Food and Commercial Workers Union is a heavyweight on the labor scene. It pays its president $350,000 a year. It’s holding its next executive board meeting in February at a swanky beachfront resort in Hollywood, Florida. And it just doled out nearly $8 million to influence the last election and lobby Washington.

But when it comes to standing by the obligation unions made to provide pensions to retirees, UFCW pleaded poverty in persuading Congress to let chronically underfunded union pension plans cut the benefits of workers, including those already retired.

“Declining participation and factors like the Great Recession have created a new reality for Taft-Hartley multiemployer plans wherein many of them are substantially underfunded,” departing UFCW President Joseph T. Hansen wrote to the House Education and the Workforce Committee in a letter this month.

More

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Your unions - working for you...NOT!

Anonymous said...

Got to love how the article spins this as if its the unions making cuts, not the companies