Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Sunday, May 05, 2013

UPDATE: Most Charges Dropped On Councilwoman Mitchell's Son

The state dropped the charges against Greg Hill and gave him a $300.00 fine plus costs for a guilty plea.

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

He was found guilty on one count of CDS-not marijuana. The other 2 counts of CDS-not marijuana and 3 counts of Paraphenalia were nolle prosed.

Every drug dealers mother should be on council so they can get off that easy.

Anonymous said...

like father , like son.

Anonymous said...

cds= controlled dangerous substance.

cds=Laura Mitchell and husband

Anonymous said...

He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.

Anonymous said...

Well 3:17 Then I guess some blame rests on police for their SYCOPHANT charging regimen huh?

Anonymous said...

317 is that u laura

Anonymous said...

It's that "all but one drug" that gets you convicted.

Anonymous said...

He didn't have a valid prescription for one drug, meaning that he illegally possessed it. Facts do matter.

Anonymous said...

Eureka --

a great defense in my murder case -- I've shot at lots of persons but this is the first time I hit the target.

Anonymous said...

Joe:

What's the scoop on her husband -- was he fired by Salisbury Univ?

Anonymous said...

Mitchell's son is a junkie this will not be the last time you see him arrested.Go get him SPD keep locking up all of these thieving junkies.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.

May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM

And we know this is a 'fact' how?

Anonymous said...

Would that one ILLEGAL prescription be Oxycodone or would it be Methadone that was prescribed to someone else?

Anonymous said...

Dr. Fox wrote valid prescriptions too. He wrote them for anyone that could pay the price, until he was arrested.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Joe:

What's the scoop on her husband -- was he fired by Salisbury Univ?

May 3, 2013 at 7:23 PM

He is no longer working there as a chemistry professor, but he is still living illegally in subsidized Milford Twilley housing with that entitlement queen who was working on her CPA degree. Funny she isn't taking any classes either, but it looked important on her campaign literature.

Disturbed in Salisbury said...

The courts ruled and even though I may not agree with it that is how this matter stands. I agree that once marked follow up is needed to straighten him out or have justice served.
Proud family I'd say
If you don't vote and voice you opinion you have lost all right to bitch and I hope your pockets can support the stupidity I see coming

Anonymous said...

Wait a minute. He pleaded guilty to one count of CDS and all he got was a fine of $300 and court costs? No jail time, even suspended? Nothing?

Wow. If that had been your kid or mine, you can bet there would have been more to the sentence than a fine.

Isn't this a felony?

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.

May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM"

Oh we are just so glad you cleared this up for us 3:17. It's so nice to know that he has valid precriptions for so many CDS's and still feels compelled to break the law and posess another one without a prescription,

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
He had a valid prescription for all but one drug. But facts don't matter on this blog.

May 3, 2013 at 3:17 PM

And what do you call a valid prescription? And why did he have those so called valid prescriptions?

I remember this past year seeing mommy Mitchel riding around on a Fatman Scooter in Walmart. Saw her on crutches. Missed meetings and work shops due to injuries/illness. Do you suppose the non valid prescriptions came from Mommy? Can you be honest about this one?

Anonymous said...

Not to worry, he will be back in court again - count on it!

Anonymous said...

The sentence was a little harsher than normal for this defendant. Most are offered the State's Attorneys Office First Time Offender program. This is still a conviction it is not a Probabtion Before Judgement, which most first time offenders are offered with the successful completion of the SAO First Time offender program.

Had he acquired an Attorney and even a Public Defender, he would have faired much better with his sentencing.