Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Friday, November 23, 2012

White House Rethinking That Corporate-Funding Ban For Obama’s Inauguration

Although taxpayers always pick up the tab for the security and the costs of the actual inaugural ceremony in front of the Capitol, all of the parties, concerts, and events surrounding that auspicious occasion come from the generosity of the president-elect-or-incumbent’s supporters. After the 2008 campaign, that pervasive spirit of Hopenchange and the accompanying historic-ness of it all meant well-funded celebrations galore to usher in President Obama’s first term — but this year, perhaps not so much.

It doesn’t look like the Obamas have any plans to tone down the festivities, but after a grueling election season and with an economy still in tatters, the White House is wondering if they shouldn’t maybe just ditch that lofty ban on corporate donations from last time around. The WSJ reports:

More 

1 comment:

lmclain said...

Why doesn't obama just put a big box in front of the White House and label it "Bribes, Campaign Contributions, and Festivity Funding"? Of course, thats redundant, but politicians are EXPERTS at plumbing the gray areas of redundancy....bottom line stays the same.....