Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Congress Considers Prosecutions Of Reporters Over Leaked Information

Washington - In response to New York Times stories that relied on leaks of sensitive national-security information, a House of Representatives panel on Wednesday discussed legislation that could allow journalists to be prosecuted for disclosing such information.

Army Col. Ken Allard testified to a House Judiciary subcommittee that the extent of national security leaks is "unprecedented" in American history. Recent examples include the Times' investigations of President Barack Obama's terrorist "kill list" and American cyberattacks on Iran.

According to Allard, such investigations threaten national security and serve only to promote the news media's self-interest. He charged that such investigations were carefully planned to help Obama's re-election chances and to advance the media's own agenda. An example, he said, was New York Times reporter David Sanger's new book, "Confront and Conceal," which details American cyberattacks on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Allard testified that Sanger was "systematically penetrating the Obama White House as effectively as any foreign agent," which he said exposed vital secrets to Iran and put the U.S. in danger of retaliation.

More

1 comment:

lmclain said...

Riiiiight. DON'T prosecute the actual PURVEYORS of the secrets. The big mouth administration officials who recklessly tell reporters classified info to make their boss obama look good, oh no....bust the REPORTERS. We kissed the First Amendment goodbye about 30 years ago.