Attention

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Will Justice Clarence Thomas Vote In Favor Of Gay Marriage?

Now that the Supreme Court has decided to take up the issue of whether gays have a constitutional right to marriage, most of the attention will likely focus on the key swing votes in the court – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy. But court-watchers should keep an eye out for a potential surprise vote: Justice Clarence Thomas. He may be inclined to join with the liberal justices on this issue.

Thomas is generally seen as a staunch conservative to the right of even Justice Antonin Scalia. He notably thinks little of the concept of stare decisis, meaning that legal precedents don’t matter much to him if he thinks they interfere with a plain reading of the Constitution’s text. Thus he has been unafraid to attack long-ingrained liberal precedents.

But Thomas’ legal thinking also has a strong libertarian bent. If he thinks the Constitution does not bar it he has been inclined to allow it. The caveat here is that his reading of the Constitution has also given states leeway in drafting laws in those cases. This can bee seen in his ruling on the last major gay rights case before the Supreme Court, 2003′s Lawrence V. Texas.

More 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

The only people who oppose gay marriage are so called "christians."

Not all of them, however there are quite a few "christians" who like to refer to themselves as such but then go and deny someone a basic civil right.

The court room is not a place for your misguided religious beliefs.

Anonymous said...

I sincerely pray that Thomas votes AGAINST gay marriages.
I would really be surprised if the supreme court judges will vote against gay marriages, but I certainly am praying that they do vote against it.

Anonymous said...

Doubtful.

Anonymous said...

It's a religious issue, not a constitutional one .

Anonymous said...

7:07 is what gives religion a bad name.

Anonymous said...

so 7:56 are you saying one does not have the right to celebrate christmas in a secular manner as well?