DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
44 comments:
no. doctors don't write prescriptions like that for a trial basis, especially in this day and age of prescription abuse. doesn't add up. doctors may prescribe a drug in small amounts to first see if there are any allergic reactions or if the prescription just doesn't relieve the symptoms. I've seen her drinking on more than one occasion, so she does like to catch a buzz
Absolutely not.
More questions should be asked about her son transporting Methadone, as well.
Not a chance.
yes ~
Heck no
NO, and anyone who believes her is really ignorant on this topic.
No, not possible. No doctor is that dumb.
Call me old school but yes - a person gives an explanation and their word, I will take it as truth until proved otherwise.
No.
No She is trying to cover her butt
Absolutely
chicken noodle soup with a soda on the side
12:30 Hey there... I have some prime waterfront property for $12 million. Trust me, you have my word. You can't be that gullible, can you? Dolt.
No. Her answer only raised more incriminating questions.
Someone needs to investigate this woman. And possibly her family if in fact the "bottle" was found in the car.
But, she had to lie on one of her stories, they can't be both.
I agree with you 12:53. By her own admission whether this is that bottle or not, she said her son had HER "prescriptions" in "his car."
NOT with HER EMPTY PRESCRIPTION BOTTLE/BOTTLES but......."her prescriptions."
Why did he have HER methadone in HIS CAR? She didn't say she was with him either when this was found.
NO
"Methadone is a Schedule II substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Schedule II drugs, which include cocaine and methamphetamine, have a high potential for abuse. Abuse of these drugs may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence."
What in the hell was her son doing with her methadone is the question to ask if you believe she is telling the truth.
if you noticed her interview, all she did was deflect and blame albero. shes a democrat, she loves the NSA spies so she should have nothing to hide, right?
Not for a minute! If you consult the publication known as the 'Physcians Desk Reference' you'll find that opium dirivitives
are NOT the therapy for physio neural complications. More effective managment tools are lithium,valium,and monoxicam for this ailment.
DON'T try to fool me , I'm the doctor.
I don't believe her, but I do think she came off pretty well in the WBOC interview.
If she never had a migraine headache before, she should have one now.
If she is telling the truth it would be easy for her to prove. All she has to do is authorize her doctor to release he medical records related to the Methadone. If it was indeed for migrane headaches it would be listed as such in her records
no
Progressive democrats never tell the truth...everyone knows that.
Not a chance. Tell a lie to CYA and all you get is more lies. That level of methadone in that dosage is not commonly or even sometimes used to treat migraines (known from personal migraine problems so I called my dr and asked. She is trying to spin this and the only believers are gullible sheeple. Sad...sad....sad.
-countrygirl@heart
12:30, that's not old school, that's naïve. I'm sure you mean well, but there's something called common sense. it would do you well to use it.
NFW - I find it difficult to believe a word she says!
Anonymous Anonymous said...
"If she is telling the truth it would be easy for her to prove. All she has to do is authorize her doctor to release he medical records related to the Methadone. If it was indeed for migrane headaches it would be listed as such in her records
October 22, 2014 at 2:28 PM"
I tend to think if she were telling the truth, this is what she would have done. Instead she shoots her mouth off about her son and his car and her prescriptions which resulted in more questions, like what is her son doing with her prescriptions at least one of which happens to be a controlled substance.
None of our business.
I find it disturbing that pharmacies actually carry such a thing.Why would anyone use a highly addictive drug to get off of another highly addictive drug? Honestly,before this incident I was unaware that meth could even be prescribed.
Hmmm, I was diagnosed with a brain aneurysm with severely debilitating migraine headaches... doctors were wary to even prescribe any opiates following brain surgery. As soon as they could, they put me on alternate medication to get me off of the low dose of opiates that I was put on to recover from surgery.
Never once was methadone mentioned as an alternate most likely because it too is addictive. anti-seizure medications, yes, antidepressants, yes, diet alterations and eliminations, yes, Caffeine alterations, yes, adding fish oil and omega 7 to my diet, yes, adding magnesium, yes... never methadone. Doesn't mean that someone wouldn't prescribe it, but I was with top neurologists and surgeons at Hopkins.
October 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM
Don't confuse methadone with methamphetamine. You can't get a prescription for "meth" (methamphetamine), but you can for methadone.
And don't they have the grandson in their home, exposed to this behavior?
I'm with you 7:17. I've had migraines for 40 years and have been on the same medicines. Seizure medicine, anti-depressant, triptans, beta blockers, botox shots, epidurals, cortisone shots, nerve block shots, etc...
Never once was methadone mentioned. In fact any time narcotics was mentioned it was to point out that they don't really work for migraine. They can cause nausea and you already have that with the migraines along with vomiting if you are like me. Also narcotics can cause rebound headaches.
I did know a lady at one time who used to go to the hospital and they gave her a shot which would knock her out. She had to have someone take her there. She couldn't get the shot unless there was a driver with her. When she would wake up her headache would usually be gone.
But I think that even if Methadone were to be prescribed for migraines the dosage would not be like the pill bottle was labeled. So my answer is no, I don't believe the reason given for the medication.
Absolutely not! Laura Mitchell had to come up with a fast explanation because she certainly wasn't about to admit she was taking methadone for addiction withdrawal. She blew it when she came up with migraines as a reason. No ethical doctor would prescribe methadone for headaches. Several doctors in Salisbury have lost their practice over being caught over-prescribing addictive narcotics much less potent than methadone. Physicians are being very cautious about prescribing controlled substances. If Laura Mitchel has been having migraines since she was 9 years old, then it's an ongoing problem and there would be no point in prescribing highly addictive methadone for a short duration. Common sense.
No she is a liar just like her counterparts Josh Hastings and Ron Pagano.
What exactly do you expect? She is in a position where she CAN'T tell the truth.At this late inning and given the consequences too much is riding on her maintaining her story.She is now gambling on public acceptance of her story.Any other explanation would be incriminating to her and who knows else.
There are some medical discussion boards in which people describe using methadone for debilitating migraines. They then go on to talk about the ramifications of taking this drug. It seems that even a slight decrease in the number of pills taken creates mental problems of varying degrees. They all say that after a short period of time they become addicted and that it is extremely difficult to withdraw from it. I have to believe that methadone is only prescribed for the most extreme migraines that limit a persons ability to function.
I can only tell you the little I know about this drug.
I fired an employee for drilling a hole in a 500 gallon oil tank while on this drug , it was obvious he was messed up . He told me to call his councilor the following day , which I did , she said he was attending rehab and wouldn't say what drug he was on.
Anyway he did tell me he was a heroin addict and this was the drug he used for cure.
Anonymous said...
Call me old school but yes - a person gives an explanation and their word, I will take it as truth until proved otherwise.
October 22, 2014 at 12:30 PM
It's not old school. You are just an idiot.
Funny I talked to the States Attorney and others about this and they are quick to point a finger at Joe without even considering Laura Mitchell or her son for breaking the law. What is wrong with you people. Laura is a lying drug addicted Democrat and you are quick to defend her and blame Joe Albero. Joe didn't make you put these pills in your mouth.
I am sick and tired of seeing Jim Mathias, Norm Conway and Josh Hastings signs everywhere without permission. I know for a fact they were put in many places without permission because I keep taking them down from my property. I also notice Jim Mathias has put his big signs in front of the smaller Republican signs. These idiots are ruthless and don't deserve to be elected.
NO...there are at least two bottles...if you tried it once and didn't like it, you wouldn't need a second bottle
drugs are easy to get , just ask the doc , any doc , you got it , or buy it on the street.
Post a Comment