Popular Posts

Sunday, March 08, 2020

Maryland Attorney General News Releases: Attorney General Frosh Joins Lawsuit Challenging the Unlawful and Unconstitutional Diversion of Billions of Taxpayer Dollars to Build Border Wall


BALTIMORE, MD - Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh today joined a coalition of 19 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s illegal diversion of $3.8 billion for the construction of an unauthorized border wall. For the second consecutive year, the Trump Administration has circumvented Congress by redirecting billions of dollars appropriated for the procurement of military equipment and military construction projects in order to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. In today’s lawsuit, the coalition argues that the court should again rule that the Department of Defense’s (DOD) diversion of already allocated funds to the construction of the border wall is an unconstitutional violation of Congress’s appropriation power.

“President Trump’s attempt to divert funds to build a border wall is unconstitutional and an abuse of executive authority,” said Attorney General Frosh. “Trump’s notion that a border wall will enhance national security is a fantasy. On the other hand, reducing or eliminating funding for military construction projects and equipment endangers the safety of our citizens and members of our armed services.”

On February 13, 2020, the Trump Administration announced that it would redirect over $3.8 billion in funds that Congress appropriated to the DOD for resources and equipment for state National Guard units nationwide toward the construction of a border wall. Congress has repeatedly rebuffed the President’s insistence on funding the border wall, providing limiting funding for fencing along the border in the 2019 and 2020 budgets.

Maryland has much at stake in this lawsuit. Specifically, the Trump Administration intends to transfer billions of dollars Congress appropriated for procurement of F-35 and C-130J aircraft, which are produced by Lockheed-Martin, a defense contractor headquartered in Maryland. The F-35 program is Lockheed’s largest, accounting or 27% of its nets sales in 2019 and expected to represent an even higher percentage of sales in future years. Additionally, in FY 2020, Maryland stands to lose as much as $614 million in military construction funding that would otherwise flow into the state economy. At-risk projects include the Presidential Aircraft Recapitalization Complex at Joint Base Andrews, a new operations building at Fort Meade, an air traffic control tower in St. Inigoes, and a U.S. Army Medical Research facility at Fort Detrick.

In the lawsuit, the coalition argues that the diversion of funds violates the principles of separation of powers, the Presentment Clause, and the Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution by usurping Congress’s appropriation powers. The coalition further asserts that the Trump Administration fails to satisfy the legal requirements necessary to divert the funds and disregards the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to consider the environmental impact of construction. The diverted funds will be used to construct a wall on the borders of California and New Mexico, which poses imminent environmental harm to more than 100 sensitive plant and animal species.

In addition to Maryland, the suit was joined by the attorneys general of Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

15 comments:

  1. NOTICE ALL DEM run states...clueless

    ReplyDelete
  2. So I just sent a scathing email to the Office of the Attorney General. Told him he as a POS and to consummate with his mustache, and has no clue how to do his job, which is to stop corruption at home, namely Baltimore and Salisbury, which is more than enough to keep him busy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Obviously Frosh does not, along all other 18 attorneys' general realize the authority and power vested in the Office of the Presidency by our Constitution. The President has the authority and power to divert or transfer monies within the Defense Department, particularly if it is determined to be in the best interests of our Country's defense. Surely controlling our borders, including structures such as a wall where needed would fall into that category.
    What a waste of time and money. Surely the democrats can read?

    As President Lincoln was quoted as saying, "the Office of the Presidency is cloaked in awesome power!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Once again, Frosh is not protecting Maryland.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lol what the hell does Maryland have to do with a boarder wall. Its freaking stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't know about you, but I am sick and tired of this P.O.S. wasting our hard earned Maryland tax dollars to fight President Trump because this clown hates Republicans. Homo Frosh was elected to fight crime in the State of Maryland and he has failed to do that. Crime in Baltimore City and Ghetto'bury is some of the highest in the Country. Where TF is the OUTRAGE!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Aanonymous said...
    So I just sent a scathing email to the Office of the Attorney General. Told him he as a POS and to consummate with his mustache, and has no clue how to do his job, which is to stop corruption at home, namely Baltimore and Salisbury, which is more than enough to keep him busy.

    March 4, 2020 at 3:12 PM

    I just wrote basically the same post before I even read the comments.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Frost is an idiot!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Everyone wants the wall build the damn thing and get it over with but you're stupid politicians can't even wipe their own behind

    ReplyDelete
  10. Frosh is a Soros stooge.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What about the unconstitutional use of tax dollars by Congress for Congress and their attempted Coup.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I hate Maryland and their leaders. I didn't vote for any of them. They don't represent me, or hardly any of the voters in the rural areas of the state. Maybe when I retire shortly, I will pack up and move to a more friendly state to it's citizens, and not one that sells out to the illegals over the citizens. For the ones that are stuck here, they might as well start learning Spanish. I'm sure Maryland will be requiring it soon.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.