Stay-at-home orders aimed at reducing the spread of coronavirus are now facing legal challenges from residents and state officials alike, alleging that some measures – mostly put in place by Democrats -- go too far while the country gradually moves toward reopening.
California alone is facing at least a dozen lawsuits that include claims that the state has unjustly closed down gun shops and religious services, infringed on freedoms of speech and assembly by restricting protests, and one case where a resident alleges that being forced to remain at home constitutes forced detention without due process.
“We’re being challenged,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday. “All across this country, every single day, governors are being challenged, local health officials are being challenged, and it’s a spirit of collaboration. Those that continue to pursue things that put people in harm’s risk, you have to have stepped up efforts and enforcement and sanctions.”
More
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-imposed-pandemic-orders-face-lawsuits-across-the-nation
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Who is forced to remain inside their home? Do they have a marine outside your door ready to shoot you if you go outside for exercise?
ReplyDeleteJust wear a mask outside and shut the hell up
ReplyDeleteWear a mask outside? What for?
DeleteUnfortunately they cannot tell the population the real problem. It has nothing to do with a virus of course. It is the debasement of the US Dollar (Reserve Currency).
ReplyDeleteIt is a sad situation because the real criminals (Fed Bankers) cannot be held accountable. They have the entire global intelligence network at their disposal and are now untouchable.
Bout time....
ReplyDeleteAsk yourself who is more likely to fully grasp a pandemic: epidemiologist and infectious disease experts or an real-estate kingpin and ex-reality TV star turned President with no scientific background or education?
ReplyDeleteGo with the latter,of course. Less likely on the take from the global criminals. Write that down.
Delete10:09 Ask yourself this. The CDC lied. WHO lied. States are inflating numbers. Who do you suggest we believe? Pull your head out of the sand ya damn sheep.
DeleteLawyers Just getting started !!! Stay Tuned !!!!
ReplyDelete10:09 I wouldn't waste your breath trying to convince them of that. They will more readily believe that people who dedicated their lives to medicine are engaged in a worldwide conspiracy before they admit Trump screwed up.
ReplyDelete10:31 Or there’s the fact that the CDC lied and WHO lied. But don’t let those facts get in your way🙄
DeleteHow did Trump screw up 10:31?
DeleteNot to mention that Trump put the travel ban in , to the screams of ,. "Racist" while pelosi said "come to Chinatown ( how is that not racist, nervous Nancy?), and calls to come to parades, and Dr Fauci saying it's fine to go on cruises...oh yeah, and CDC and WHO are lying. So I too will repeat the mantra... how did Trump screw up?
DeleteGo get em
ReplyDeletescrew Hogans hamburger orders
take his money in lawsuits
10:09
ReplyDeleteWhich would you trust more. Paid for globalist epidemiologists or the President who can't be bought?
Get your head out of your rectum and wake up!
Yes 10;09 If you mean the lying deep state useful idiots for the swamp who lie and deceive.mouthpieces for the luciferian globalists!! Faucci is a lying snake Pos..they put trump up against a wall..he did his best under the attack by his enemies, you do realize he does so under duress. They got their 2 trillion. POFFF ITS GONE!!!
ReplyDelete1016 - yeppers a Lawyers Xmas dream come true!
ReplyDeleteThose people arnt sheep, their shills....communist cheering on their team of corruption. They can only project the blame on Trump because they havent received the talking points yet today. Hogan and his shills are in this up to their triple chins, they should be sued and forced to resign.
ReplyDeleteBy Kirk Allen on May 18, 2020
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has been issuing executive orders for the last two months, and as people began to understand their rights and push back he took to threats and intimidation in hopes people would comply with his inappropriate and apparent illegal executive orders.
We first exposed a 2001 Attorney General opinion regarding the limitation of 30 days for Executive orders in this article. The Governor denied knowledge of the legal opinion from the very office representing him. Many of the Governor’s defenders quickly dismissed the opinion because of it being an informal opinion written during a Republican administration. We find those excuses laughable because the legal analysis is what is important.
Pritzker’s nightmare exposed – Lisa Madigan legal opinoin
Lisa Madigan issued her opinion on the applicability of executive orders to the Illinois State Police Merit Board in 2013. This appears to be yet another legal opinion either overlooked or ignored by Pritzker and his legal team. The value in this opinion lies not only from the fact it is signed by Lisa Madigan, but it is backed by an Illinois Supreme Court case.
Applicability of Executive Orders – “The Constitution provides that “[t]he Governor, by Executive Order, may reassign functions among or reorganize executive agencies which are directly responsible to him.” Ill. Const. 1970, art. V, § 11. This is the only reference to executive orders in the Constitution and, as a result, the only circumstance in which an executive order clearly carries the force and effect of law.”
“In general, article V, section 8, of the Illinois Constitution provides that “[t]he Governor shall have the supreme executive power, and shall be responsible for the faithful execution of the laws.” Citing this authority, the Illinois courts have suggested that an executive order may be a permissible method by which the Governor can execute an existing law, but that an executive order is not a vehicle for establishing a new legal requirement. Buettell v. Walker 59 Ill. 2d 146, 153-54 (1974). . Accordingly, the Governor does not have power to legislate by executive order, and, therefore, unless authorized by law, an executive order relating to matters other than executive reorganization can be no more than a policy directive to agencies under the Governor’s control. To conclude otherwise would cede to the Governor legislative powers which he is prohibited from exercising by the separation of powers doctrine. See Ill. Const. 1970, art. II, § 1; see generally Ill. Const. 1970, art. IV, § 1.”
Additional language in the opinion also points to the most basic legal analysis on statutory construction, a point we have written about dozens if not hundreds of times.
Chincoteague VA should SUE the Governor !! He lets VA Beach Open
ReplyDeletewhich is Far Larger , & keeps the island Shut Down !!! Hint Hint !!!
How does Nancy sleep at night? What kind of person can be evil and still act like a princess.
ReplyDelete