Popular Posts

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Peter Franchot Is Not Happy with MDOT

24 comments:

  1. It was poor planning 40 years ago when adding the new bridge which only had 3 lanes. As for mass transit - NO ONE USES THAT. Everyone wants their own car. Foolish idea and typical liberal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 40 years ago there wasn't that traffic.

      Delete
  2. Oh you just dont know..i commute two times a week mon morn and thurs evening. Its a mess very frustrating. Get that alternate crossing completed like yesterday but as we know years and millions will be wasted on studies before anything actually reduces the problem.

    Mass transit does not exsist on shore so how is that supposed to work? No commutrr trains, no buses no ferries, just that F ing bridge

    ReplyDelete
  3. how about just close the bridge (haha!)?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Keep voting for your LIBUTARD Democrats. They NEVER fix a problem. ONLY create more. With your money.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WTF doe this have to do with Peter Franchot anyway??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's already running for governor.

      Delete
  6. It is a way for him to get his name out there even more when he runs to replace Hogan... He is just trying to demonstrate that he is the most viable candidate for the democratic nomination by commenting on things ad nauseam so that people are familiar with him... Typical political posturing...

    Although, he also isn't wrong...

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is the typical bull$hit being thrown out of the mouths of Democrats. Trash anyone else’s plans with no plan of your own. What maintenance plan does Franchot have that can be done differently and does not include the long term closures of one lane at a time? I driven home vet the bridge twice since the jersey barriers were put into place sectioning off the right west bound lane. Completing the work on a 24 hour schedule ASAP is the best plan. Do I understand correctly that all three west bound lanes need similar repairs and the center and left lane are scheduled for similar closures?

    ReplyDelete
  8. 9:46 is right. Franchot has been mentioned at the most viable candidate to run against or after Hogan retires.
    Plus, since he is our state "CFO", the gridlock is affecting state commerce. So, yes, he does have reason to chime in on this.
    I feel sorry for companies like the Bay Shuttle and any other logistics firms who have no other options. It's got to be affecting their bottom lines'.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just trying to get attention

    ReplyDelete
  10. Idiots in Govt should have Built a NEW bridge by now
    before closing Any of this one !!!!

    It will Not be able to Close this one for as long as they say
    because there is Far Toooo much traffic for that !!!!

    Build a Bridge-Tunnel next time so the bridge can be Low
    to the water & Not Far Tooo high up in the air, like this one !!!

    Take lessons from Virginia !!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yep, "Peter" Franchot and Liberal Len Foxwell are trying to make a name for themselves when he runs for Governor. Liberal Lenny is chomping at the bit to be named Chief of Staff or Secretary of some department.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I have a question for Dierk Haire, who have you got lined up to run Governor? Foxwell and Franchot have been campaigning for a year now so who do you and the Maryland Republican Party have lined up?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous said...
    9:46 is right. Franchot has been mentioned at the most viable candidate to run against or after Hogan retires.
    Plus, since he is our state "CFO", the gridlock is affecting state commerce. So, yes, he does have reason to chime in on this.
    I feel sorry for companies like the Bay Shuttle and any other logistics firms who have no other options. It's got to be affecting their bottom lines'.

    October 8, 2019 at 10:50 AM

    "So, yes, he does have reason to chime in on this."
    Sorry, but this doesn't fall under his job description.

    WTF is a "Bay Shuttle?"

    ReplyDelete
  14. Franchot wouldn't know a thing about the traffic if it wasn't for Len Foxwell bitching about it. Maybe he should move to the other side of the bridge and shut up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Start a ferry service for the Bay Shuttle. Problem fixed!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, now you have more reason to put that third proposed span near Cambridge so people like us her eon the shore can get to Charles county in less than 3 to 4 hours... Since you have to go all the way up to the bay b ridge and all the way back down to southern Maryland...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Need another blue ribbon panel to study the feasibility of another bridge.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So who is he???? Just another politician looking for a free ride....

    ReplyDelete
  19. All the $$$$ the Demon-crats are waisting on Illegals

    (over 200 Billion) could have built many Bridges !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I say tear the ones down we already have.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So Mr. Franchot is sending a letter to DOT to stop work during the Fall/Winter season. What, does he think spring and summer is a BETTER time to work on the bridge. When they are all headed this way every weekend. Not smart, Mr. Franchot.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The toll lane seem to have very little to do with it-it’s compression of traffic (10 lanes into 2–you can see it’s backed up on the bridge side of the toll plaza).

    That comment was on Mr. Franchot's FB page. You have three lanes expand to ten or whatever the number, pay a toll and then try to merge back into two lanes. Even with an "extra" lane on the other bridge therein is the problem.

    And there is a weigh station on either side that contributes to delays when they are open.

    This person denies what the problem is and then describes the same problem she denies. I just found it odd.

    There is stop and go traffic, of course, there will be delays, if only for that reason.

    Maybe they need a policy where once traffics gets to a certain volume, backed up a certain distance, or some other trigger, they could waive the tolls until traffic congestion gets manageable. Then resume and waive tolls with the ebb and flow of traffic.

    Smoothly flowing traffic and safer traffic patterns are well worth the few missed tolls, aren't they?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.