To accomplish gun control, leftists are citing bogus evidence and carefully choosing which tragedies to exploit.
Democrats are so perturbed by the Second Amendment that they are resorting to the distribution of fraudulent data. For example, during a recent congressional meeting with President Donald Trump, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) presented findings from professor Louis Klarevas, whose analysis points to a homicide-through-mass-shooting reduction rate of 37% between 1994 and 2004 — when the 10-year Federal Assault Weapons Ban Feinstein championed was in effect. Even if we ignore the reality that this claim is an extreme outlier — it has virtually no peer backing — there are still some major issues with Klarevas’ assessment. According to Ars Technica co-founder Jon Stokes:
There are few actual “assault weapons” of any type in his dataset, either pre- or post-ban. Klarevas and his allies are taking an apparent drop in fatalities from what are mostly handgun shootings (again, pre-ban as well as post) and attributing this lowered body count to the 1994 legislation. … Had Klarevas chosen a “mass shooting” threshold of five fatalities instead of six, then the dramatic pause he notes in mass shootings between 1994 to 1999 would disappear too.“
More
Aint Gonna Happen !!! NRA will Protect America !!!!
ReplyDeleteif I read it right, the dems can't change the amendment, without being ratified by the states. Doesn't that mean we the people must vote on it?
ReplyDeletegood luck with that
ReplyDeletethey want a Civil War
ok, more of us than you
he he
Id like to Eliminate the Democratic party, is there a way to do this?
ReplyDelete