Straining at gnats while swallowing camels is increasingly how Islam’s apologists rationalize away the violence and hate Sharia engenders for the “infidel,” the non-Muslim. Consider the significance of yet another video of yet another learned Muslim justifying the enslavement and rape of non-Muslim women.
Suad Saleh, a female professor of doctrine at Al Azhar University, correctly defines the Arabic phrase melk al-yamin -- “right hand possession” (see Koran 4:3):
[Non-Muslim] female prisoners of wars are “those whom you own.” In order to humiliate them, they become the property of the [Muslim] army commander, or of a Muslim, and he can have sex with them just like he has sex with his wives.
Ms. Saleh’s comments are not new or unique. Countless Muslims -- beginning withMuhammad himself -- have confirmed that Islam permits the sexual enslavement of non-Muslim women seized during the jihad.
Saleh cannot even take the “honor” of being the first Muslim woman to support this inherently misogynistic creed.
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
This is what we are fighting against......President Trump understands the enemy and they don't even deny the truth? Wake up people!
ReplyDeleteAin't that just precious! So, what constitutes "war" now? Just say that they are an infidel and the Jihad them by declaring a personal war, rape them, and let them go afterward? "The war's over man, Wurnor dropped the big one" ~~ Animal House.
ReplyDelete"Nearly 1600 years later, a Muslim cleric in the UK receiving welfare referred to British taxpayers as “slaves.” He explained:
ReplyDeleteWe take the jizya, which is our haq [“right”], anyway. The normal situation by the way is to take money from the kafir [“infidel”], isn’t it? So this is the normal situation. They give us the money -- you work, give us the money, Allahu Akbar. We take the money."
Now this explains most of the inner-city welfare! Just change a few names around there you have it.
Assimilate or leave ! Simple Stupid !
ReplyDeleteDemocrats never speak out against this.
ReplyDeleteAfter military conquests, Muhammad would dole out captured women as war prizes to his men. In at least one case, he advocated that they be raped in front of their husbands. Captured women were made into sex slaves by the very men who killed their husbands and brothers. There are four Quranic verses in which "Allah" makes clear that a Muslim master has full sexual access to his female slaves, yet there is not one that prohibits rape. The Quran gives Muslim men permission to beat their wives for disobedience, but nowhere does it order love in marriage (although it does say that "love" exists). The verses plainly say that husbands are “a degree above” their wives. The Hadith says that women are intellectually inferior, and that they comprise the majority of Hell’s occupants.
ReplyDelete@ 10:35 And yet liberal feminists support them.
ReplyDeleteNO! Not in America. It may be their beliefs but NOT IN AMERICA!
ReplyDelete11;19,that's the insanity of it.
ReplyDelete