It seems almost like a bad actor trying to do a Tomi Lahren impression. Even the name of the segment is a ripoff. Points are good but this woman is certainly no Tomi. She comes across as fake. Almost like a bad SNL skit.
Whether Tomi or not she is exactly right. The information is 100% correct.
Hey 8:34 - Ever think that this chick may have been doing this before Tomi but Tomi gets more publicity? Of course you didn't. Just another person complaining. Maybe you should have kept it simple and just wrote 'Points are good' and be done.
They are both yummy. You don't see smart attractive women like this on the left, do ya? All you see are dudes like Rachel Madcow.
And that's why people are uninformed and fall for fake news. If the person is attractive enough they will believe anything, and if they are not attractive enough they question their motives and if they are copying someone else, but don't bother considering the facts. smh.
Her facts were true. So why aren't they investigating Podesta, Hillary and Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation for their ties to the Russians instead of Donald Trump. They have no evidence of wrong doing by Trump. And they have tons on the Clintons. Especially that deal with the uranium and Russia's nuclear ties.
It seems almost like a bad actor trying to do a Tomi Lahren impression. Even the name of the segment is a ripoff. Points are good but this woman is certainly no Tomi. She comes across as fake. Almost like a bad SNL skit.
ReplyDeleteWhether Tomi or not she is exactly right. The information is 100% correct.
ReplyDeleteHey 8:34 - Ever think that this chick may have been doing this before Tomi but Tomi gets more publicity? Of course you didn't. Just another person complaining. Maybe you should have kept it simple and just wrote 'Points are good' and be done.
They are both yummy. You don't see smart attractive women like this on the left, do ya? All you see are dudes like Rachel Madcow.
934
ReplyDeleteYou are hilarious!
Thank you
Put Liz and Tomi together, WINNER!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd that's why people are uninformed and fall for fake news. If the person is attractive enough they will believe anything, and if they are not attractive enough they question their motives and if they are copying someone else, but don't bother considering the facts. smh.
ReplyDeleteHer facts were true. So why aren't they investigating Podesta, Hillary and Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation for their ties to the Russians instead of Donald Trump. They have no evidence of wrong doing by Trump. And they have tons on the Clintons. Especially that deal with the uranium and Russia's nuclear ties.
ReplyDelete