Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant’
Democrats in Montana have opposed a bill banning the use of foreign law in its state courts on the grounds that such legislation would target Muslims.
Senate Bill 97, introduced by Keith Regier (R-Kalispell) bans the application of foreign law in Montana’s courts, with the debate particularly focused on Sharia Law, a form of Islamic law typically used in the Middle East.
Although the bill passed on party lines by 56-44, Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities.
They used the excuse they were running from prosecution in their country and needed to come to the US to live by our laws to escape from these conditions. They lied on their reason to enter which is a cause for deportation. So why are they still here?
Those liberal Democrats might be insane Sharia Law murders as in puts to death homosexuals and Muslim women that commit adultery. Where is the LBGT community. With Sharia Law they would all have a death sentence.
I would like to see a few of those Democrats who against banning Shria Law get beheaded by muslems claiming it was their right under Shiria Law. I wonder how those democrats would feel about that?
It is instead a way of governance, the precludes any other form of governance including our already f'ed up system of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. ' It is NOT a religion by any Western definition, so don't be fooled. It's a governance that controls one's life by others, not you!
clueless idiots.
ReplyDeleteHeadline is Misleading the bill FAILED BUT it is to show how treasonous dems are on voting for it.
ReplyDeleteANY politician that passes Sharia law needs to be ARRESTED FOR TREASON.
ReplyDeleteIf they think it is all good then why don't they try defending against a charge in a Sharia court!
ReplyDeleteThey used the excuse they were running from prosecution in their country and needed to come to the US to live by our laws to escape from these conditions. They lied on their reason to enter which is a cause for deportation. So why are they still here?
ReplyDeleteThey can run but we Americans AINT gonna change our LAWS for a radical idiology.
DeleteIf they think it is all good, then why don't they move to a country that has sharia law and see how good it is then. Bunch of bloomin idiots.
ReplyDeletePerhaps someone should outline exactly what Sharia law is and how it affects the laws we have in America.
ReplyDeleteWe have ONE LAW in America ANY politician that trys to change this needs to be ARRESTED FOR TREASON.
DeleteCan't wait for one of those in favor of Sharia Law to be caught cheating on her husband then stoned before sunset the same day.........
ReplyDeleteSnowflake Rocks.
DeleteThose liberal Democrats might be insane Sharia Law murders as in puts to death homosexuals and Muslim women that commit adultery. Where is the LBGT community. With Sharia Law they would all have a death sentence.
ReplyDeleteBut the Jim Iretons and Mollys want to support these nice people lol give em ur address jimbo.
Delete
ReplyDelete"Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities."
So what...this is the U.S.A.
If they want sharia move the F..K out of America.
ReplyDeleteTargeting Muslims? No, it's saving the country from a surreptitious takeover.
ReplyDeleteI would like to see a few of those Democrats who against banning Shria Law get beheaded by muslems claiming it was their right under Shiria Law. I wonder how those democrats would feel about that?
ReplyDeleteA few personal canings or hand amputations (the ones always in the cookie jars) might change some Democrats' minds.
ReplyDeleteThere WILL be millions of dems without hands or thrown off of buildings.
DeleteHaving never been to a beheading or stoning, these flakes don't know what "repugnant" means.
ReplyDeleteThey should pass a law banning ALL religions in a court of law.
ReplyDeleteWe need a federal law followed by state laws for every state and we need it soon.
ReplyDeleteIslam is not a religion as we consider religions.
ReplyDeleteIt is instead a way of governance, the precludes any other form of governance including our already f'ed up system of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. ' It is NOT a religion by any Western definition, so don't be fooled. It's a governance that controls one's life by others, not you!
Of course this idea targets muslins. That's the point!
ReplyDelete