Popular Posts

Sunday, August 31, 2014

UPDATE: Self Defense Alleged In OC’s Weekend Fatality; State’s Increased Bail Request Denied

SNOW HILL — Less than 24 hours after the arrest of two local men for their alleged role in the death of a Pennsylvania man found unconscious in a downtown hotel parking lot early Sunday morning, one of the suspects had his bond set at $400,000 during a hearing on Wednesday afternoon, and the groundwork for a self-defense approach has already been laid out.

Around 3 a.m. on Sunday, Ocean City police officers responded to the parking lot of a hotel on 2nd Street to assist Ocean City EMS with an assault that had already occurred. Upon arrival, OCPD officers found the victim, later identified as Justin D. Cancelliere, 37, of North Whitehall, Pa., unconscious and unresponsive. First responders from the OCPD and the Ocean City Fire Department initiated emergency lifesaving procedures on the victim and transported him to AGH where he was later pronounced deceased. An autopsy was performed on Monday, and the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Baltimore has ruled the nature of Cancelliere’s injuries as head and neck trauma and the cause of death a homicide.

After an investigation, OCPD detectives determined the assault occurred during an altercation in the area of Talbot Street and Baltimore Ave. The two suspects, identified as Caleb Edwin-Earl Ochse, 27, of Ocean City, and Christopher Blake Kendall, 22, of Ocean City, had entered the Fat Daddy’s restaurant around 2:30 a.m. on Sunday and ordered food.

More

30 comments:

  1. Sorry, but if you're involved in a self defense situation you certainly don't flee. You stop the threat, call the police, or go straight to a hospital to get checked and report to police.

    They must know our court system is a JOKE!

    ReplyDelete
  2. While this may very well be self defense, I take extreme offense to the tasteless statement released by the family of one of the defendants.
    To even hint that this was a rush to judgment is ludicrous. A rush to judgment and he would have been charged with murder.
    At this point in time a more appropriate statement would have been just a simple offer of condolences to the family of the victim. Nothing more- nothing less.
    The dissertation into why this happened was out of line and should have been reserved for a later date. Clear to see now, why this young man has had difficulties his entire life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Either way if the suspects were defending themselves, or if they started it, when you are out at 2:30 in the morning, you are looking for trouble. Go to bed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. For real 7:57. Self defense my a$$.
    Remember in the Zimmerman case, he called 911 after the threat to him was eliminated.
    Report says they ran east toward the ocean, where at some point they had to realize they we out of danger (if they ever really felt they were in any danger to begin with) and called 911.
    Or is they were really in fear, they would have called because even though the victim was immobile he still had friends who weren't and could have been a threat to them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. According to the MD Judiciary Website, Caleb is no stranger to fighting, dwi, and general mischeif.

    ReplyDelete
  6. welcome to ocean city. a "family" resort

    ReplyDelete
  7. I call BS. If it were self defense that means you are in fear for your life and you would call for help as soon as you felt you were in a safe position as said above.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sounds like another case of affluenza. Rich family, always bailed him out, he didn't know how to control himself. Not HIS fault. Now that he's risen to this level of violence, what's next, when he gets out?

    ReplyDelete
  9. A study in dysfunction.
    No sign of remorse, just excuses and a lame attempt at justifying.
    Who cares what the tapes show. The altercation occurred outside and not in view of the tapes. That's all that's important.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The minute the four men followed the two locals out of the restaurant and trailed them they became the aggressors. Sounds like they were looking for trouble. Good thing there is video.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with 9:07. Four-on-two. One guy thought he was Rambo and these two little locals were going to be fodder for him trying to impress his buddies. Not this time. You pick a fight that time of morning, hundreds of miles from home, on two smaller men, for no reason, with three bigger guys to back you up...tough luck on you.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wrong 9:07. By no one's stretch of the imagination is just merely following someone the definition of an aggressor.
    The tape is a nonissue. Completely useless really. What occurred outside is the only thing that matters.
    Not saying this wasn't justified but to say the tapes proves that it was, is silly. Unless the victim was shown to have provoked a reasonable person to use physical force for protection the manslaughter charges will stick.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 9:34. You are wrong. I have been followed late at night and it is terrifying. Following someone is very aggressive.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think I would be willing to give the accused the benefit of the doubt more if they had gone to LE and not LE had to go looking for them.
    That would be more in line with self defense. By not contacting LE right away seems like they wanted to get their stories in line with each other. And really the only thing that matters is what happened outside. Hopefully there is an independent witness to all of this.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The act of "following" someone in and of itself, is NOT an act of aggression.
    Just following someone does not make the follower an "aggressor", some other action must take place for it to be an act of aggression. There are lots of reasons you might follow someone and many reasons you may THINK you are being followed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Isn't Raymond Kendall, of Kendall Furniture, Christopher's father?

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Anonymous said...
    9:34. You are wrong. I have been followed late at night and it is terrifying. Following someone is very aggressive.

    August 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM"

    A more accurate description would be to say following someone is very intimidating. The act of intimidation means to make someone fearful.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I wonder how long before Ochse starts blaming Kendall and Kendall blaming Ochse. You know it's coming.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 11:05 but obviously these 4 men followed the other two and it resulted in a fight. They were not just taking a leisurely stroll. They were up to no good.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree 12:40 but none of that matters. They were followed as an attempt to either intimidate and/or provoke. No kidding we get that. The only question that matters is who was the aggressor. Following someone is, in no way, shape or form an act of aggression. It's not even an act of stalking in of itself.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is sickening. The tape tells very little of the story-no audio and only what happened inside.
    The Ochse family sounds clueless and should have remained silent instead of trying to make a case in the media.
    This enabling and excuse making is a major factor in why this young man has had so many run in's with the law.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 11:21 your an idiot. Your not even close. Why post something you have no idea what your talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Like most altercation's, people don't call the police, especially if the fight ensued, ended and the two parties went their separate ways. Playing devil's advocate here, you don't leave a fight thinking the other person's going to die later of injuries. He has a record of fighting, but do we know the victim's record? Probably not. A past of fighting doesn't mean he set out to intentionally kill someone. Now, had the victim lay lifeless in the parking lot immediately after the altercation I'd say sure, he was wrong to just walk away knowing that something was wrong with him! At the end of the day, he did take someone's life whether it was intentional or not and he should have to serve time for manslaughter. It's a good thing that Fat Daddy's cameras caught some of the action leading up to the altercation on surveillance.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Another published account states that Ochse and his buddy were being disorderly inside Fat Daddy's. That certainly might explain attention (staring?)they allegedly got from the victim. Regarding alleged following, the route the victim's group was taking was on the way back to the hotel they were staying. You want to say they were following, it's just as easy to say (and impossible to prove) that Ochse was laying in wait for them.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I do agree with sby16grl. This is manslaughter, not murder. And someone in similar circumstances got 7 years for it same prosecutor, I believe.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You beat me to it 9:44. I was going to say pretty much what you said.
    How special that the family leaves the disorderly part out of their statement, proving only that the apple doesn't fall to far from the dishonest tree.
    The bum is a liar and it's clear to see it's in his genes.
    aby16grl, okay so we give them a pass for not calling police right away, but he has no excuse for refusing to talk to the police the next day.
    He's a no good SOB-his prior record speaks for itself- and reading this makes me ill. Seems the whole family is tacky crass and vulgar. Not only do I think this is not the right time for their side of the story but to blatantly be dishonest about it takes it to a whole new level of their obvious dysfunction.

    ReplyDelete
  27. "Anonymous said...
    11:21 your an idiot. Your not even close. Why post something you have no idea what your talking about.

    August 28, 2014 at 9:52 PM"

    What do you have some kind of mental problem or something.
    Someone asked a question is all.
    You must be a friend of the defendants. Mental cases of a feather flock together.
    Now go smoke your dope, get drunk, throw bricks at cop cars and whatever else losers like you all do for entertainment.

    ReplyDelete
  28. How do you know they were being "followed"? Maybe the 4 were going back to their hotel, and it happened to be in that same direction....wait until all the facts come out. Yes Caleb is pretty much a dirtbag, and nobody knows about the deceased, but wait for the whole story before rushing to judgment one way or the other.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Kendall would best be served by coming out with the real story.
    Most of what Ochse or even his family are saying can not be believed. At one point his aunt is saying in comments elsewhere that the victim and his companions were yelling obscenities and picking a fight with the defendants. She claims in the story linked to this post that the defendants were "jumped."
    Lying comes naturally to this family.
    It's also telling as to the family's character when they omitted the part about the defendants causing a scene in Fat Daddy's, which would give reason for anyone in the establishment to stare at them.
    I have no sympathy. He as well as his dysfunctional family need a lesson in how to live in a civilized society.

    ReplyDelete
  30. These people are huge democrats therefore it's in their genetic makeup to dismiss any personal responsibility, make up excuses and attempt to pass the blame on to someone or something else for their own bad actions.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.