The American people aren't falling for NSA's propaganda. They want the rogue agency reined in. But Obama refuses to rein in the NSA, Dianne Feinstein says that Congress "doesn't have the votes" to do anything about mass surveillance, and at least some judges are supporting the NSA's spying (and it's not clear what the Supreme Court will do). But states are trying to fight back ... Legislation has been introduced in 10 states (and counting) proposing one or both of the following:
(1) Cutting off water, electricity or other resources to NSA facilities within the state
(2) Prohibiting the state's cooperation with the NSA; for example, sharing data about its citizens, or university research support for NSA
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Not in the communist state of MD...so far up new world order ass they cant see sunshine ..... dark evil web they weave...and omally and MD libtards scream for more
ReplyDeleteThis does make sense to ensure the privacy of the citizenry of the state. Or at least what's left of it.
ReplyDeleteStop the crying. They could care less about you. You will never know what had prevented another attack in the US. If something were to happen then everyone would cry about increasing security... any way necessary.
ReplyDeleteNo, we wouldn't, 502. We all know nothing has been "prevented" and that we are just as vulnerable as before 9/11.
ReplyDeleteAT 5:02. The government of Russia gave us advanced warning about one of the Boston Marathon bombers, but our incompetent government officials didn't "prevent" anything from happening. It ain't about security fool, it's about crushing dissenters of the establishment elite.
ReplyDelete5:02 Anyone that would sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither.
ReplyDelete