Popular Posts

▼

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Today's Survey Question 10-18-11

If someone files a protective order against another person and the person who filed the protective order purposely makes contact, do you believe BOTH parties should be held accountable?
at

13 comments:

  1. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:03 AM

    Of course not, The party that filed the order should be fined for violation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:05 AM

    No - only the person who violated the order.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM

    NO!

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:13 AM

    No, the person needs to run away or ignore their contact. Be smart enough to know the situation that you are in.

    ReplyDelete
  5. GeraldOctober 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM

    Any new up dates on the Citi Bank arrests you posted? Did anyone find out why they were arrested?

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:14 AM

    Yes if the contact is for the purpose of inducing the other party to make contact thereby violating the order.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM

    No, not both. If someone files and is granted a temporary protective order and they make contact w/the defendant then they need to have some consequences. It is something that needs to be done as to stop the misuse of this particular court filing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 12:03 PM

    absolutely not

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 12:05 PM

    Yes, both parties should be held accountable. If you file for a protective order against someone, then make contact with that person you claim to fear, you should be held acocuntable.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 12:29 PM

    Didn't the coffee thing happen before the peace order?

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 12:50 PM

    Yes, 12:29. According to what was published in the Daily Times. She tossed the coffee, Ruark filed a criminal complaint and then she filed the peace order.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 4:54 PM

    No contact means no contact on both sides. If the person who filed the order makes the contact the PFA is void.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousOctober 18, 2011 at 5:12 PM

    No, unless it can be proven that the other party somehow instigated or encouraged the contact.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.