By DeWayne Wickham
This is not an easy column for me to write. It’s never easy to tell someone you like that he’s a disappointment. I like Barack Obama. I liked him the first time we met back in 2006 when I took a small group of journalism students to Washington, D.C., for a meeting with the then-freshly minted U.S. senator.
I liked Obama even more when an aide to his presidential campaign invited me to a July 2007 speech he gave laying out his commitment to improve life for people in urban America — which for most politicians is a euphemism for black America.
“Today’s economy has made it easier to fall into poverty. … Every American is vulnerable to the insecurities and anxieties of this new economy. And that’s why the single most important focus of my economic agenda as president will be to pursue policies that create jobs and make work pay,” Obama said that day to his mostly black audience.
At that time, the nation’s overall unemployment rate was 4.7%. Whites had a jobless rate of 4.2% while the black unemployment rate stood at 8.1%. Today, the black rate is 15.5%, nearly double that of white job-seekers.
I don’t blame Obama for the economic conditions that are responsible for so many blacks being out of work. The seeds of this problem were planted long before he moved into the Oval Office. But I do fault him for not doing more to fix this problem.
The poor in urban America, he said in that 2007 speech, “suffer most from a politics that has been tipped in favor of those with the most money, and influence, and power.” And then he asked rhetorically, “How can a country like this allow it?” To which he answered, “We can’t.”
But so far, under his leadership, he has allowed it.
Finding work for the jobless is the best anti-poverty program this nation can mount. But while the Obama administration spends $608 million during the first 17 days of its involvement in Libya’s civil war — it can muster neither the money nor the will to combat black unemployment.
The president’s failure to fight this problem as vigorously as he wages war abroad gets a pass from black leaders, many of whom complain to me privately but remain silent in public. They’re reluctant to challenge Obama the way Martin Luther King Jr. did Lyndon Johnson in 1967.
America “would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor” so long as it was involved in the Vietnam war, King said in a speech in which he called for an end to that bloody conflict.
Last month, as the Obama administration applauded the creation of 216,000 new jobs and a slight dip in the overall unemployment rate, the gap between whites and blacks without work widened as the black unemployment rate inched up.
In December 2009, when the black unemployment rate was just 5.5 percentage points higher than the national rate, Obama told USA TODAY that he didn’t think he needed to do anything special to close this gap. Now that it is nearly 7 percentage points higher, black leaders should demand that the president devote as much attention on this problem as he has on ending the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy and in pushing for immigration reform.More here
I think if Obama cut back on the amount of money and length of time one could spend on welfare/unemployement then we would see a decrease in the gap between white unemployement and black unemployement. Maybe the difference here is the ones willing to go back to work before their handout runs out and the ones not even trying until they quit getting everything they can for free.
ReplyDeleteRemember, obama is only half black....he's been hanging around rich white people so long now, he's starting to think those poor black urban youth are nothing but a bunch of rappin', gang-bangin', drug dealing losers (who, by the way, don't do much voting). Power and money has a way of changing your viewpoint....but it IS very interesting to see that the black leaders of today won't confront him. Can you imagine what King would be saying today (in light of the way he castigated Johnson for the plight of blacks during HIS administration)?
ReplyDelete"BARAKEY" like they screamed during the Announcement to the highest office in the land; cannot pull enough Dough fromm those old white dudes to give everyone a high dollar car to chill out in.
ReplyDeleteAs long as 75% of African Americans are born out-of-wedlock, I'm not sure the question should be what others can do for them. Social services and boards of education are spending hundreds of millions preparing minorities for work, but there isn't much desire to work when there are so many handouts.
ReplyDeleteYou can lead a camel to water but you can't make them drink.
ReplyDeleteI still say that to receive money for welfare, one must do public work to earn that money and also take a mandatory pee test for drug use. Just think of the amount of money the gov't could save by utilizing these folks to dig ditches, clean up highways, clean out the sewers and so on. Also, they must be sure to to keep it uniform across all races. If you want a check, pee in a cup and go to work! We all know that the dumbocrats would rather punish the hard working people of this country to give the worthless their "entitlement freebies".
ReplyDeleteMost of these welfare recipients are third and forth generation. They know how to get supported by the government (you and me) and they exploit it. Hell, if you have a couple of kids (a family of four) and make under fifty thousand... you pay zero in taxes. They know how to work the system. I would not even know how to apply for public assistance if, God forbid, I should have to. That is why the Mexicans are coming here like slaves to the promised land... they want to work.
ReplyDelete3:32
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. If they want to eat they must work doing something. I also think everyone that is sitting in prison should be working doing something. They could sew clothes... heck they could build cars. Think how cheap they would be then. There is a lot these people should be MADE to do if they want to eat.