Health care reform is "hanging on by a thread," and one or two votes could determine the outcome of the heavily-debated bill, Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd told CNBC today.
"Everyone feels, I guess, to some degree who have been for this, that they would have liked something different, and that's not uncommon when you're considering an issue of this magnitude," Dodd said.
Some progressives, for example, are disappointed that the Senate bill, unlike the House version, does not include a public option, he said. Senators Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas are two people who voted for the bill in its original form and are now carefully watching what changes are being made.
President Obama's administration has come under fire lately for putting too much emphasis on health care reform, causing many to question whether Democrats will retain their majority control come November. But Dodd, who is retiring this year, said it's an issue that needed to be dealt with — otherwise it would "strangle our economy," he said.
"If this is all about surviving politically, then we're missing the whole purpose of what we're supposed to be doing," he said.
Last week, Dodd, 65, announced that he would not run for reelection in November. His announcement was seen by many as a concession that he and the Democratic party are facing an uphill battle. But Republicans have said that as a result of his retirement, Democrats have a much better chance of holding onto his seat.
As chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Dodd said he is also moving forward with the financial reform bill, and that the committee is closer to answering fundamental questions, such as too big to fail.
He hopes the legislation will more strictly regulate derivatives and consolidate the number of financial regulators, and he hopes to mark the bill up in the committee by the end of the month.
He said the committee is in agreement that there should be an independent agency to protect consumers, but there is still debate over which form it will take.
Dodd also said he thinks it would be a "travesty" not to confirm Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's nomination, and that in the absence of taxpayer money, the government should have no say in banks' compensation practices.
Good CUT THE THREAD and SAVE the COUNTRY from an ECONOMIC DISASTER, MORONS........ANyone there that is TRULY PATRIOTIC and LOVES thie COUNTRY to be FREE of ANY MARXIST/FASCIST Designs?.......if so CUT the THREAD and BURY HEalth CARE Marxism bill!!
ReplyDeleteStop using capital letters or they will be rejected from here on out.
ReplyDeletesorry Joe won't happen again I just get so upset with these political fools i feel like shouting glad you have a forum where the ordinary tax payer can vent his frustrations with the establishment:}
ReplyDeleteWe feel ya Ben and Geri.
ReplyDeleteIn two years (he must wait that long because of the revolving door law) Dodd will be one of the biggest lobbyists in DC, and making a fortune, along with Harry Reid.
ReplyDeleteThey are both disgusting.
Senator Dudd was forced to abandom a rerun by the boss. Everyone saw his poll numbers at 35% against every opponent in the R primary.
ReplyDeleteWhat is an obamanation (like the president) is that former drunken murdering Teddy's senate seat is being filled by ballot next Tuesday. What media has been saying the Republican challenger has that was 35 points back at christmas, and 9% back 9 day's ago was found to be 1% ahead ( although within the margin of error). The outrage as this pertains to the article her is that IF the Republican wins the Mass. attorney general will refuse to certify the winner before Feb 20th so the dumbocrat gov's appointment can still vote for this plan. It has been a campaign issue and the voters are against. Another tea party in Boston maybe.