Here is a great link to a map. It not only shows the USA but you can click on each state and it will give you the results on each county in that state.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Sp what does this mean, that teh country is run mainly by a little portion of areas? How is this possible?
ReplyDeleteJust shows that the Democrat controlled "machine" cities, with their patronism, corruption, and racketeering are controlling the electorate.
ReplyDeleteThe cities are all bankrupt and crime ridden. Soon the cancer of democrat control will kill this country.
It's possible because of population density. The rural areas of states overwhelmingly voted Republican. The more densely populated metropolitan areas voted Democrat. Unfortunately (in my mind, anyway)the metro areas had the greater numbers.
ReplyDeleteIt's kind of hard to understand that map unless you rationalize that the blue portions are areas of high populations...Big cities
ReplyDeleteI would question the accuracy of that map. With the way it looks John McCain should be president but he only won 20 states while obama took 30 and one example would be nevada where Obama clearly won you show Mccain winning!
Heres a better map in my opinion include it if you like:
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/election2008/2008-election-map.html#/president?view=race08
That's not an election map. It's map showing the stupid democrats where all of our $$$ is going to be re-distributed.
ReplyDeleteThe Map is a COUNTY MAP, not State
ReplyDeleteGood future reference. The next republican candidate needs to work harder in the big cities of america. By the map, one would think that McCain should have won since he claimed a majority of america's land mass.
ReplyDeleteI'm feeling mighty blue, but very red in the face!
ReplyDeleteJoe:
ReplyDeleteMaybe the electoral college should be based on acreage, not persons! And after that we can bring back the poll tax and IQ test to vote.
Anon 8:20, land mass doesn't vote, people do, which is why the Democrats won. They received the votes of most of the people.
ReplyDeleteI think that chart is very interesting. Joe, you should now post a chart that shows the crime rate in this country. There should also be a third chart that shows how many of those cities have a Democrat as mayor.
ReplyDeleteYou should have to own or paying on a home to be able to vote.
ReplyDeleteLooks Blue to me.
ReplyDeleteANONYMOUS 10:10-
ReplyDeleteThat is the most rediculouls thing I have ever heard. So because I rent and have 2 children in the school systems been on my job over 10 years and pay my taxes that means I cant vote? Do you know how dumb you really sound?
Wait a second, I thought Obama won in MD? I see no blue at all in the state of MD. Eastern or Western shore.
ReplyDeleteIf I read that wrong I'm sorry. I just didn't see any blue in MD.
Ok, nevermind, I just woke up. I'm working overnights. Lol. I made a mistake reading that map. I've answered my own question.
ReplyDeleteDear Red States:
ReplyDelete>
> If you manage to steal this election too we've decided we're leaving.
> We intend to form our own country, and we're taking the other Blue
> States with us. In case you aren't aware, that includes us (California),
> Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan,
> Illinois and all the Northeast. We believe this split will be
> beneficial to the nation, and especially to the people of the new country of
> New California.
>
> To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the
> slave states. We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get the
> Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood. We get Intel and Microsoft. You
> get WorldCom. We get Harvard. You get Ole' Miss. We get 85%
> of America's venture capital and entrepreneurs. You get Alabama.
>
> We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the
> red states pay their fair share.
>
> Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22% lower than the
> Christian Coalition's, we get a bunch of happy families. You get
> a bunch of single moms.
>
> Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice
> and anti-war, and we're going to want all our citizens back from Iraq
> at once. If you need people to fight, ask your evangelicals. They have
> kids they're apparently willing to send to their deaths for
> no purpose, and they don't care if you don't show pictures of their
> children's caskets coming home. We do wish you success in Iraq, and hope that
> the WMDs turn up, but we're not willing to spend our resources
> in Bush's Quagmire.
>
> With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of
> 80% of the country's fresh water, more than 90% of the pineapple
> and lettuce, 92% of the nation's fresh fruit, 95% of America's
> quality wines, 90% of all cheese, 90% of the high tech industry, 95% of the corn
> and soybeans (thanks Iowa!), most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal,
> all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven
> Sister schools plus Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.
>
> With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to
> cope with 88% of all obese Americans (and their projected health care
> costs), 92% of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100% of the tornadoes, 90% of
> the hurricanes, 99% of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100% of
> all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University,
> Clemson and the University of Georgia.
>
> We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.
>
> Additionally, 38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah
> was actually swallowed by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred
> unless we're discussing the war, the death penalty or gun laws, 44% say
> that evolution is only a theory, 53% that Saddam was involved in
> 9/11 and 61% of you crazy bastards believe you are people with
> higher morals then we lefties.
>
> Finally, we're taking the good pot, too. You can have
> that dirt weed they grow in Mexico.
>
> Peace out,
>
> --Blue States
Why is there so much red?
ReplyDelete