Popular Posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Crooked Oak Comments

Last night at the Civic Center many people showed up to voice their opinions about the proposed "park" on Crooked Oak Ln. Although there were about 50 - 60 people, I had hoped that more would attend. The important thing was that people showed up to take part in the democratic process. A great deal of information was shared ranging from property value to soil composition.

Rick Pollitt was not present and thats fine. This was not a question and answer forum and Ricks job was get the matter before the legislative body. It was the Councils responsibility to hear the comments from the public so that they can use the input to represent the will of the people when they vote on this matter.

Now - down to brass tacks. I did not count the number of people for or against "a" park but I believe it was about 50/50. BUT that's not the end of the story. Many of the people who spoke in support of "a" park were not supportive of either a park at that location OR a park which costs more than what is fair.

Those who spoke in favor of a park at that location regardless of the cost seemed to me to be driven by what they perceived to be good for "the children" of Wicomico County. They didn't offer much rebuttle to the claims that the infrastructure couldn't support the park or that the costs to improve the infrastructure would be incredibly high at a time when we are, by some estimates, suffering from a 10 million dollar backlog of road repairs we cannot afford to make. Neither did they rebut, with any substance , the claims that the appraisals were extremely suspect. They seemed to be of the mindset, by and large, that we need a park for the children regardless of the cost or impact.

Those who spoke in opposition to the purchase of the land at that location for a park seemed to have taken the time to either gather facts or engage in thought relating to the impact this park would have. I was part of this group. Let me say that I went to this meeting with an open mind AND the opinion that we don't need another park. When I left, I was of the opinion that we do need another park....but that we should use land we already have.

As I mentioned in my earlier post prior to last nights meeting, I had been in contact with John Cannon and Rick Pollitt in attempts to get some questions answered as well as to get copies of the appraisals for review. I was unable to get them in time for the meeting so I contacted an appraiser and a real estate agent. I was told by this appraiser that a fair market value of this property (with which he was familiar) was approx. $1,250,000.00. The real estate agent conducted a market analysis of the property in question which resulted in a price of approx. $1,185,000.00. I trust the aforementioned sources without question and have ALWAYS found them to be on the money. The two appraisals completed at the direction of the County Exec. are now avail. for review. I got an e-mail from Rick Pollitt yesterday at about 1:00 p.m. I intend to get copies of these appraisals and have my appraiser render his opinion. The fact is I want to know for sure if the cost for this land is as ridiculously high as it seems. I believe that the appraisals are way way too high. When I gave my opinion last night I expressed that this land deal stinks. I explained that I wasn't accusing anyone of wrongdoing but that in light of recent events there is a feeling that the county is crooked and that this deal wreaks of impropriety. If Rick Pollitt and this Council want to rebuild the trust of their citizens in their government, they MUST avoid deals like this at all costs.

In support of the figures I presented last night, many people stood to state that they also belived the cost per acre ($18,000.00) was way too high. One couple currently have a 200 acre farm with 4 wells for sale in Hebron, which is not too far from the property in question. This property has been listed for sale for two years. It is listed at $6000.00 per acre and they have been told that the price per acre is about $1400.00 per acre too high! This may be a viable alternative.

Another gentleman stood to advise that he has a couple of parcels which, I think, total 70 acres right on Rt. 50 in Hebron with access to major roads that would appear to be able to handle the increase in traffic without the disruption of local rural neighborhoods.

I don't know Gary Mackes. I didn't even know what he looked like until last night. Admittedly, I've never had a high opinion of him due to the fact that I believe he has been instrumental in creating a situation where OUR high school students have to go to another county to have their prom (This is a battle which I will most assuredly fight at another time). Despite this fact, if the statements made relating to the ten year search for property for a park on the west side of Wicomico county are true, then Mr. Mackes has failed to do enough to actively seek real estate that would fit the bill in a manner which would make the best use of taxpayers money. Plain and simple.

I have heard from Rick Pollitt that this is not county tax money. That it comes from real estate transfer taxes. This money still belongs to the tax payers. This tax was put in place by our elected officials pursuant to an act of legislation. Legislation could be enacted to re-route this money to the general fund to ease the tax burden on the citizens of this state.

Folks, we are on the brink of $4.00 per gallon gas prices. We have seniors on fixed incomes who must make decisions on what they can cut from their food budget in order to heat their homes. We have families with children who are cutting things from their budget to be able to afford the gas to get back and forth from work. People are being laid off due to a "slump" in our economy which may prove to rival that of the early '80's. In spite of this our state is reaching into the pockets if its citizens to fund a self-imposed 1.4 billion dollar budget deficit, yet they manage to fund projects like "Open Spaces" which permits millions of dollars to be spent by individual counties on land aquisition, then say it's not tax money.

I am asking our local officials to make a stand. Don't spend this money. Send a message to our state legislators that we need to stop this frivolous spending and ease the burden on it's citizens. We cannot justify squandering tax payers money on a local level then demand fiscal restraint at a state and federal level. It has to start right here.

13 comments:

  1. Thanks so much for attending the meeting and reporting what went on there. You nailed it, I believe. The overview of the situation is disturbing, and needs to be changed. Tax money is money paid by tax payers, almost all of whom are feeling the pain of a slow economy right now. It somehow is insulting to have that money squandered by elected officials who consider it free money.
    Keep up the fight, Joe. You're making real progress. People are talking to each other about issues that they're reading about here.
    DG52

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's put it plainly (and briefly):

    This is a sweetheart deal to bail out some real estate speculators that makes that Beare-Starnes mess look pale by comparison -- at least the investors there did not get more than a pittance.

    The property appraisals are absurd -- who did them?

    And how much in campaign contributions did the property owners' family make to Pollitt, McCain, Cannon and others in the County election last year?

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is the next step towards acquiring this property for the County? IS is a done deal, or can the public still influence the process? What can be done?
    Calls? Letters? Emails?
    Please advise. Thanks...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the idea of a new park is bad for several reasons. No matter where the money is coming from it just doesnt seem responsible to spend it now. Why put the park on that corner? Does anyone realize that there is a park in the neighborhood on the opposite corner of the church. Take a ride in there. Playground, tennis court, basketball court. Move the park some where else where there is a real need. But do it when the economy is in a better place.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Where is this pirates wharf park in nanticoke? I live here and have never heard of it.Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  6. 10:13...That would be Crooked Oak Playground, and indeed, it is within walking distance of this proposed site. In addition, it has some swings, a playset and a soccer net. I've lived in that area for 12 years, and almost every time I have taken my children there, whether it's morning, afternoon or evening, we are the only ones present!

    This is perhaps my biggest beef with this whole park issue. The parks that the county ALREADY HAS are not being utilized! We need another?

    ReplyDelete
  7. According to the Parks & Rec website there are 58 parks already in Wicomico County, 35 of which have some kind of playground area. There is already one right at Crooked Oak, I just don't understand the need for another park!?!?!
    They really need to use the money for up-keep on the parks they already have. How about fixing the broken equipment, or updating old equipment with newer? Adding safer mulch, filling in holes in the ground or even just using the funds to pay someone to clean-up the parks more regularly? Empty the trash cans more often, or scrub the human feces off the sliding board?
    These are things I'd like to see done to increase the safety and usefulness of our existing parks...adding a new park is just uncalled for!

    ReplyDelete
  8. E-mail your elected officials. Write letters to the editor. Comment on the Grapevine. More importantly.....put up educated comments on the blogs.

    For everyone who cares to know....this morning I went to the office of the County Exec. and obtained copies of the appraisals. They were completed by Trice Appraisals and Tidewater Appraisals. Tidewater Appraisals are apparently located in Delaware. I made an appointment with an appraiser with whom I'm familiar and I know to be extremely accurate. I provided him with these appraisals. Upon glancing at these appraisals, it appeared as though the value of the land was obtained by considering them as improved with 3200 square ft. residences on 10 individual lots with an average size of 10.66 acres with a starting price of...........$450,00 - $500,000! Very soon these appraisers will provide me with a fair and accurate valuation of these properties based on what they are.

    I think it will be almost impossible for any elected official to sign off on this thing in good conscience now. The price is way too high. The economy is much too bad to justify that kind of wasteful spending. Too many other alternatives have been offered up in opposition which at a minimum demand a re-evaluation based on what we now know. AND the reputation of the county govt. is still too red assed from the spanking it took from the landfill affair to withstand the public scrutiny it would take if such a purchase is approved.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Grandad for attending the meeting and giving us this analysis of what went on, or what is actually the facts in this case.
    I watched it on Pac14 and was happy to see that the citizens were given plenty of time to make very well thoughtout coments. Wonder if the mayor and Louise were watching and hopefully learned something. There is no doubt in my mind that this is a sweetheart deal and I think the County Council will have to turn it down!

    A. Goetz

    ReplyDelete
  10. Holy smokes, Grand Dad! Say it isn't so!
    How could the appraisers, in good conscience, value the land in this way? More, importantly, how could the council have submitted an option agreement knowing this??

    ReplyDelete
  11. I just hope that everyone remembers these facts when the council votes on it, anyone voting for it is up to no good! They've got something up their sleeve and need to be replaced asap!

    ReplyDelete
  12. STOP complaining people about how they are spending the money in the treasury. You elected them unless you are a member of that large group that can't take the time to get off their ass and go vote. If you didn't vote , shut up for you have no say. The people that elected the Mayor and Council had faith in them and are probably happy. It's you, the NO voter who complains. Maybe next time all will vote.

    ReplyDelete
  13. STOP complaining people as to how the monies are being spent unless you voted in the last election. Those citizens who elected Barry, Gary etc.,are probably happy with everything that is happening.Non-voters have NO say and need to shut-up and read their library book.All the negative are written b non-voters and others who aren't happy with anything. If it rains, they want sunshine. If it's sunny, they want rain or snow. Yes, this group loves to complain and are mostly losers in life. They accomplish nothing and are jealous of those who do and are our leaders.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.